![Jafari v 23 Developments Pty Limited [2019] VSCA 201 episode artwork](https://d3t3ozftmdmh3i.cloudfront.net/production/podcast_uploaded/1884674/1884674-1559547406106-d59f94056592b.jpg)
Jafari v 23 Developments Pty Limited [2019] VSCA 201
from Coffee and a Case Note Hosted by James d'Apice
“So are we in partnership, or not?” ___ A claimed to own property and was in financial trouble. It agreed with R that A would sell the properties to R and A would help develop them and share profits: [3], [4], [143] This arrangement fell apart because A didn’t own the properties: [6] R did buy the properties from the mortgagee in possession and – speaking broadly – discussions progressed further on the basis A would still play a role: [8], [43] The parties couldn’t agree on how to proceed and relations broke down: [9], [49] A claimed to be in partnership with R, and that R breached its partnership duties to the tune of $6M: [13], [143] A said that, among other things, the “general tenor” of the agreement and the profit share element meant it was a partnership agreement: [146] The Court disagreed. There was no express term that R would own the properties on behalf of the partners, or provision of liability of one partner for a co-partner’s dealings; references to “the project” were not indicia of partnership; and references to “partners” in early drafts of the document had been removed in the final version: [164 – 170]
Embed this episode
No transcript yet.