James Lindsay Interview | Why many 'Critical Social Justice' arguments are fraudulent dogma, and how this spreads a false narrative episode artwork

EPISODE · May 6, 2020 · 1H 2M

James Lindsay Interview | Why many 'Critical Social Justice' arguments are fraudulent dogma, and how this spreads a false narrative

from E2 Review: Politics, Discussion, Debate · host Max Klinger

Please remember to give this a good rating and review if you liked it, that really helps people find the show (apparently).I spoke to acclaimed author and former academic James Lindsay about his involvement in the 'Grievance Studies Probe', which he led, and which demonstrated that so much of what passes as progressive academic thought is little more than fraudulent dogma. We discuss how and in what ways Social Justice Academia paints a false picture of society, and why and how it must be countered. James is the author of a number of books, including 'How to Have Impossible Conversations', which he co-authored with Peter Boghossian, and 'Cynical Theories: How Activist Scholarship Made Everything About Race, Gender and Identity - and Why This Harms Everybody', which he co-wrote with Helen Pluckrose. Along with all other episodes, this podcast is also available on our youtube channel, 'E2 Review Podcast'. Click here, or use this link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oibez7I2fVs SOCIAL MEDIA:Follow Max (the host) on twitter: @MaxE2ReviewFollow E2 Review on twitter: @E2ReviewFollow E2 Review on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/e2review/Follow E2 Review on TikTok: @E2ReviewFollow James on twitter: @conceptualjamesCONTACT US:[email protected] the show

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published May 6, 2020

Embed this episode

Please remember to give this a good rating and review if you liked it, that really helps people find the show (apparently). I spoke to acclaimed author and former academic James Lindsay about his involvement in the 'Grievance Studies Probe', which he led, and which demonstrated that so much of what passes as progressive academic thought is little more than fraudulent dogma. We discuss how and in what ways Social Justice Academia paints a false picture of society, and why and how it must be c...

Distinct summary based on available episode metadata or transcript content.

NOW PLAYING

James Lindsay Interview | Why many 'Critical Social Justice' arguments are fraudulent dogma, and how this spreads a false narrative

0:00 1:02:11

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of E2 Review: Politics, Discussion, Debate?

This episode is 1 hour and 2 minutes long.

When was this E2 Review: Politics, Discussion, Debate episode published?

This episode was published on May 6, 2020.

Can I download this E2 Review: Politics, Discussion, Debate episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!