John MacDonald: E-scooters need to be classified as vehicles

If the amount of money spent on ACC claims over the past five years for e-scooter injuries doesn’t convince you that tighter laws are needed, I don’t know what will. And if the amount of money spent on ACC claims over the past five years for e-scooter injuries doesn’t convince you that NZTA made a big mistake deciding not to make e-scooters subject to the road rules - again, I don’t know what will. The figure relates to injuries all over New Zealand. But it appears that us lot in Canterbury have copped it the worst. Or maybe we’re the most reckless. The flatness of the place probably has something to do with it. Because, Christchurch especially, is brilliant for riding anything. Which is maybe why new data out today shows that, in the past five years, there have been more e-scooter injury claims in Canterbury than anywhere else in the country. Here, there have been 1,761 ACC claims lodged by Health NZ. Compared to 1,378 in Auckland, which has way more people - they’ve had claims. The $55.6 million in claims between September 2020 and now has the AA saying - again - that there aren’t enough rules around e-scooters. Saying it’s crazy, for example, that it isn’t illegal to ride an e-scooter drunk. And it wants alcohol restrictions for e-scooter riders. No argument from me on that one. It is crazy. The AA also thinks it’s crazy that there’s no age limit and no mandatory helmets. No argument from me on both of those, either. But it’s going to be very tricky to do anything about any of those things as long as e-scooters aren’t considered or treated as vehicles. Which is the big mistake NZTA made, when it gave e-scooters this dispensation. Just so the private e-scooter operators could get their way and operate without any consideration for the road rules. No licence required; no obligation to follow the same rules as other road users; no previous experience required; no helmet required. There’s not even a speed limit enforced. Plus, you can ride anywhere and everywhere. The other thing about this $55.6 million in ACC claims, is that e-scooter owners and e-scooter companies don’t pay ACC levies. People bang on all the time about people coming here from overseas and getting free ACC cover - the reason being that you can’t sue in this country and so we have to provide cover for people from overseas. The exact same thing is happening with e-scooter users. Private owners and people who use the hire scooters get free ACC cover. which, over the past five years, has cost us $55.6 million in claims. The AA says time’s up and tougher rules are needed. I’m saying that isn’t going to happen until we classify e-scooters vehicles. That’s the nub of the problem and that’s what needs to change. LISTEN ABOVESee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.