EPISODE · Feb 27, 2026 · 44 MIN
Judicial Hot Take: Sedlik v. Kat Von D - Is the 9th Circuit’s Two-Part Infringement Analysis Fatally Flawed
from Music Row Dealmakers · host Barry Neil Shrum
Send us Fan MailDealmakers Barry Neil Shrum, Esq. and Dennis Glenn Disney Esq. discuss the 9th Circuit's recent opinion in the Sedlik v. Kat Von D case involving Jeffery Sedlik's famous "Shh" photograph of Miles Davis, which Kat Von D tatooed on the arm of her friend. In the 9th's opinion, there were two concurring opinions which bemoaned the application of the "intrinsic" component of the 9th Circuit's two party analysis, arguing that the objective standard should be abolished. Support the show
Embed this episode
Ready to play
Judicial Hot Take: Sedlik v. Kat Von D - Is the 9th Circuit’s Two-Part Infringement Analysis Fatally Flawed
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.