Judicial Hot Take:  Sedlik v. Kat Von D - Is the 9th Circuit’s Two-Part Infringement Analysis Fatally Flawed episode artwork

EPISODE · Feb 27, 2026 · 44 MIN

Judicial Hot Take: Sedlik v. Kat Von D - Is the 9th Circuit’s Two-Part Infringement Analysis Fatally Flawed

from Music Row Dealmakers · host Barry Neil Shrum

Send us Fan MailDealmakers Barry Neil Shrum, Esq. and Dennis Glenn Disney Esq. discuss the 9th Circuit's recent opinion in the Sedlik v. Kat Von D case involving Jeffery Sedlik's famous "Shh" photograph of Miles Davis, which Kat Von D tatooed on the arm of her friend.  In the 9th's opinion, there were two concurring opinions which bemoaned the application of the "intrinsic" component of the 9th Circuit's two party analysis, arguing that the objective standard should be abolished.  Support the show

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Feb 27, 2026

Embed this episode

Ready to play

Judicial Hot Take: Sedlik v. Kat Von D - Is the 9th Circuit’s Two-Part Infringement Analysis Fatally Flawed

0:00 44:26

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Music Row Dealmakers?

This episode is 44 minutes long.

When was this Music Row Dealmakers episode published?

This episode was published on February 27, 2026.

Is there a transcript available for this episode?

Yes, a full transcript is available for this episode. You can read the complete transcript on the episode page.

Can I download this Music Row Dealmakers episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!