Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System episode artwork

EPISODE · Jan 15, 2016 · 58 MIN

Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System

from Free Thoughts

Why is objectivity important when it comes to how judges decide cases? Tara A. Smith joins us this week to talk about what people mean when they say “We want judges to be objective and to uphold the law.”We discuss the what, how, and why of judicial objectivity, first principles, the value of discretion among different government actors in a legal system, and we compare Smith’s theory of judicial review to other, competing theories.Show Notes and Further ReadingSmith’s book on this subject is Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System (2015).Trevor recommends the 1961 movie Judgment at Nuremberg, directed by Stanley Kramer.Near the end of the episode, Smith mentions Randy Barnett and Josh Blackman’s Weekly Standard article “The Next Justices.” Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jan 15, 2016

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System

0:00 58:03

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Free Thoughts?

This episode is 58 minutes long.

When was this Free Thoughts episode published?

This episode was published on January 15, 2016.

Can I download this Free Thoughts episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!