Judicial Sass episode artwork

EPISODE · May 19, 2023 · 43 MIN

Judicial Sass

from Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture · host The Heritage Foundation

This week the justices decided six more cases including those against Twitter and Google for allegedly aiding and abetting ISIS terrorists, and the copyright dispute over Andy Warhol's images of Prince. Zack interviews Judge Jennifer Perkins of the Arizona Arizona Court of Appeals. And, inspired by some serious judicial sass from Justice Kagan directed at Justice Sotomayor, GianCarlo selects other famous and funny cases featuring the justices at their sassiest.Follow us on Twitter @scotus101 and @tzsmith. And please send questions, comments, or ideas for future episodes to [email protected]'t forget to leave a 5-star rating.Stay caffeinated and opinionated with a SCOTUS 101 mug. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published May 19, 2023

Embed this episode

Ready to play

Judicial Sass

0:00 43:38

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture?

This episode is 43 minutes long.

When was this Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture episode published?

This episode was published on May 19, 2023.

Can I download this Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!