Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties, Docket No. 25-83 episode artwork

EPISODE · May 15, 2026 · 6 MIN

Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties, Docket No. 25-83

from 9robes · host 9robes.ai

When you sign an arbitration agreement with your employer, you're agreeing to let a private arbitrator settle disputes instead of going to court. But what happens if that arbitrator rules against you and orders you to pay thousands of dollars? Can your employer simply walk away from the federal court system entirely? The Supreme Court just said no. In a unanimous decision, the justices ruled that federal courts keep the power to review arbitration awards even after sending a case to private arbitration. For workers like Adrian Jules, who lost his job and his arbitration case, this decision means courts can still check whether the arbitration process was fair.music for the podcast provided by ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Dimitry Taras

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published May 15, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties, Docket No. 25-83

0:00 6:22

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of 9robes?

This episode is 6 minutes long.

When was this 9robes episode published?

This episode was published on May 15, 2026.

Can I download this 9robes episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!