EPISODE · Mar 9, 2020 · 21 MIN
June Medical Services v. Russo - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
from SCOTUScast · host The Federalist Society
On March 4, 2020, the Supreme Court oral argument in consolidated cases June Medical Services v. Russo and Russo v. June Medical Services (formerly June Medical Services v. Gee and Gee v. June Medical Services), which involve the constitutionality of Louisiana's law requiring physicians who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a local hospital and whether abortion providers can be presumed to have third-party standing to challenge health and safety regulations, such as Louisiana's admitting privileges law, on behalf of their patients.To discuss the case, we have Steven Aden, Chief Legal Officer & General Counsel at Americans United for LifeAs always, the Federalist Society takes no particular legal or public policy positions. All opinions expressed are those of the speakers.
What this episode covers
On March 4, 2020, the Supreme Court oral argument in consolidated cases June Medical Services v. Russo and Russo v. June Medical Services (formerly June Medical Services v. Gee and Gee v. June Medical Services), which involve the constitutionality of Louisiana's law requiring physicians who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a local hospital and whether abortion providers can be presumed to have third-party standing to challenge health and safety regulations, such as Louisiana's admitting privileges law, on behalf of their patients.To discuss the case, we have Steven Aden, Chief Legal Officer & General Counsel at Americans United for LifeAs always, the Federalist Society takes no particular legal or public policy positions. All opinions expressed are those of the speakers.
NOW PLAYING
June Medical Services v. Russo - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.