Just How Bad Were the Oral Arguments Re: Presidential Immunity? episode artwork

EPISODE · Apr 29, 2024 · 1H 10M

Just How Bad Were the Oral Arguments Re: Presidential Immunity?

from Opening Arguments

Episode 1028 Can a former President of the United States be prosecuted for trying to overturn a democratic election? The Supreme Court just spent two hours and forty minutes (!) hearing a case in which they were supposed to be reviewing this simple question and Donald Trump’s claims of total immunity. We review the last oral argument of this term and try to cut through the bad faith, irrelevance, and misdirection to understand what is actually happening here and where it all might be going. DC Trump indictment (8/1/23) Government’s brief in Trump v. U.S Trump’s brief in Trump v. U.S. CSPAN’S complete bookmarked SCOTUS oral arguments in Trump v. U.S. (4/25/24) If you’d like to support the show (and lose the ads!), please pledge at patreon.com/law!

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Apr 29, 2024

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Just How Bad Were the Oral Arguments Re: Presidential Immunity?

0:00 1:10:54

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Opening Arguments?

This episode is 1 hour and 10 minutes long.

When was this Opening Arguments episode published?

This episode was published on April 29, 2024.

Can I download this Opening Arguments episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!