Landmark glyphosate safety study retracted for Monsanto ghostwriting, other ethics problems

from U.S. Right to Know articles · host Stacy Malkan

A scientific study that regulators around the world relied on for decades to justify continued approval of glyphosate was quietly retracted last Friday over serious ethical issues including secret authorship by Monsanto employees – raising questions about the pesticide-approval process in the U.S. and globally.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Dec 3, 2025

Embed this episode

Attribution link and audio player

NOW PLAYING

Landmark glyphosate safety study retracted for Monsanto ghostwriting, other ethics problems

0:00 7:09

1×

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Share this episode

Similar Episodes

No similar episodes found.

Similar Podcasts

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of U.S. Right to Know articles?

This episode is 7 minutes long.

When was this U.S. Right to Know articles episode published?

This episode was published on December 3, 2025.

Can I download this U.S. Right to Know articles episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.

URL copied to clipboard!