Lazy Relativism

The HBS hosts do NOT agree to disagree! On the first day of co-host's Leigh's classes, she  warns her students against (what she calls) “lazy relativism.” The example she gives is of a conversation in which two people have been at odds for a while, they suspect that they are not going to come to an agreement on the matter at hand, and so one of them says: “yeah, agree to disagree” or “everybody has different opinions on this” or, worst of all, “what’s true for you is true for you, and what’s true for me is true for me.”That last iteration, in particular, is an expression of the kind of  “lazy relativism” we're discussing in this episode.When people repeat this dictum of “what’s true for you is true for you, and what’s true for me is true for me,” might it be that what they’re really meaning to communicate is “this is a hard conversation that has come to an impasse, I don’t want to argue with you about it anymore, but I also don’t want to offend you by appearing disrespectful”?Today, we're talking about why lazy relativism seems to be the go-to disposition for so many when encountering a disagreement, what exactly is “lazy” about it, and whether or not there are non-lazy forms of relativism.Full episode notes available at this link:https://hotelbarpodcast.com/podcast/lazy-relativism-------------------If you enjoy Hotel Bar Sessions podcast, please be sure to subscribe and submit a rating/review! Follow us on Twitter @hotelbarpodcast, on Facebook, and subscribe to our YouTube channel!You can also help keep this podcast going by supporting us financially at patreon.com/hotelbarsessions.  ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★