Liberty and Justice For All

Separating U.S.-born and non-U.S.-born citizens in public service would sow mistrust, deepen animosity, fuel division, and undermine the unity that Americans depend on. Furthermore, drawing distinctions between U.S.-born and non-U.S.-born citizens in public service would not strengthen our nation—it would fracture it. It would breed mistrust, inflame division, and erode the unity that is essential to a strong and functioning democracy. Dividing public servants based on whether they were born in the United States is a dangerous path. It would foster suspicion, deepen resentment, and tear at the fabric of national unity that holds Americans together. In addition, creating distinctions between U.S.-born and non-U.S.-born citizens in public service would undermine social cohesion, increase mistrust, and weaken the sense of shared national purpose that is vital to effective democratic governance. Creating distinctions between U.S.-born and non-U.S.-born citizens in public service would raise serious constitutional concerns by undermining the principles of equal protection, civic equality, and shared national allegiance that are foundational to American democracy. Such a division would risk fostering distrust, social fragmentation, and unequal treatment among citizens under the law. Government policies that distinguish between U.S.-born and non-U.S.-born citizens in public service threaten core constitutional values, including equal protection, equal citizenship, and the principle that public institutions must serve all Americans without arbitrary distinctions. By creating separate classes of citizens, such measures would invite mistrust, division, and a weakening of the national unity essential to democratic governance. A governmental policy that distinguishes, for purposes of public service, between citizens by reason of birthplace is in tension with foundational constitutional commitments. By creating disparate classes of citizenship, such a measure would risk undermining the equal dignity of citizens, fostering division where the Constitution presupposes unity, and weakening the bonds of common allegiance essential to our democratic order. Lastly, the Constitution does not countenance governmental measures that, absent the most compelling justification, divide citizens into separate classes based on the accident of birthplace. A rule that distinguishes between U.S.-born and non-U.S.-born citizens in public service would threaten principles of equal citizenship, invite public mistrust, and erode the national unity on which the republican government depends.FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/AlMinaUSSenate2020/Buy Me Coffee: buymeacoffee.com/faceconomics                LOCALS: https://faceconomics.locals.com/WORDPRESS:https://faceconomics.wordpress.com/2016/09/18/abuse-of-power-brave-heart-the-giant-withinbraveheartthegiantwith/Donate to Our Mission of Combating Racism: https://faceconomics.wordpress.com/2016/09/18/abuse-of-power-brave-heart-the-giant-withinbraveheartthegiantwith/ZAZZLE:https://www.zazzle.com/collections/al_mina_for_virginia_2020-119301197824100835****AUDIO PODCASTS**** SPOTIFY: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/faceconomics9/subscribeAPPLE PODCASTS: https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/bff4c73d-db21-4e02-8909-627db85d0PODCHASER: https://podchaser-podchaser-frontend-staging.podchaser.com/podcasts/faceconomics-podcast-1597315TUNE IN: https://tunein.com/radio/faceconomics-p1393434/SOUNDCLOUD: https://soundcloud.com/search?q=faceconomicsYOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/@AlMinaFaceconomicsODYSEE: faceconomics: https://odysee.com/@aldous.mina:4X: https://x.com/mina_aldousINSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/aldous.mina/?hl=enBITCHUKE:https://old.bitchute.com/channel/G4BFzYZukL9O/