Licence to Thrill (Property Lawyers): EE and H3G v AP Wireless II

In this episode of Unpacking the Case, our head of legal training Richard Snape examines the decision in EE Limited and Hutchison 3G UK Limited v AP Wireless II (UK) Limited, regarding the Electronic Communications Code, the Digital Economy Act 2017 and the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954.At the heart of the dispute is the question: when telecoms operators occupy land under an agreement, are they tenants with leasehold rights, or merely licensees?Richard explores how the courts are approaching telecoms agreements following the reforms introduced by the Digital Economy Act.The discussion considers the consequences for landowners, telecoms operators, investors and property professionals involved in telecoms infrastructure and development sites.Relevant Cases:Pretoria Energy Company v Blankney Estates [2022]Newham LBC v Thomas-Van Staden [2008] Brilliant v Michaels [1945]Swift v MacBean [1942]Get in touch! Training & Free Webinars for Property Professionals:Would you like to keep up to date with the latest in real estate law? Davitt Jones Bould offers legal training tailored to your organisation’s needs, delivered in person across the UK or remotely. We also run free monthly webinars through for surveyors, solicitors, and property professionals across sectors. To sign up or learn more, visit our events page here or email [email protected] for information and booking.  This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not intended to provide legal or professional advice. No liability is accepted by Davitt Jones Bould for any reliance placed on its content. Get in touch!