MA v Lindsay Clancy, Part 4

This week on 13th Juror, we’re continuing our coverage of the Lindsay Clancy trial as the prosecution rests its case and the defense finally takes over. We break down the digital evidence prosecutors used to reconstruct Lindsay’s final hours before the children were killed—and then hear from the people who knew Lindsay best, who describe the mother and nurse she was before watching her mental health deteriorate in the months leading up to January 24. Then, we finally get to the heart of the defense case: the experts. What does psychosis actually look like? Can someone experiencing psychosis still drive, make phone calls, Google directions, and appear completely normal? And what do the experts believe was happening inside Lindsay’s mind when she killed her children? We’ll also break down some of the week’s most contentious cross-examinations—including a surprising exchange with Patrick’s mother, Sue Clancy, and the prosecution’s attempts to challenge the defense experts and Lindsay’s claims of hearing a voice. With the defense nearing the end of its case and rebuttal testimony still to come, the central question of this trial is finally taking shape: Was Lindsay Clancy criminally responsible for what she did? As always, I'll lay out the evidence so you can be the 13th Juror and decide for yourself. 🎧 Follow 13th Juror Podcast on your favorite podcast platform so you never miss an episode. ⭐ If you enjoy the show, please leave a rating and review. 📱 Follow Brandi Churchwell and 13th Juror Podcast on social media for case updates, behind-the-scenes content, and upcoming episode announcements.