Skip to content
Major Moral Argument Mistakes (Part 2) episode artwork

Oct 25, 2019 49 min

Major Moral Argument Mistakes (Part 2)

from I Don't Have Enough FAITH to Be an ATHEIST

How good is the moral argument? A retired attorney wrote Frank asserting that we don’t need God for objective morality. Some of his challenges can be summarized in the following questions: • Does the moral argument depend on everyone agreeing on right and wrong? • Can human beings construct an objective moral standard independent of God? Couldn’t the majority vote do that? • Are God’s commands based on God’s desires? • Are they based on God’s authority? • Can’t evolution explain morality? • Do changing views on morality mean there is no objective morality? • What about moral dilemmas? Do they show morality is relative? Join Frank as he continues his response to these challenges.

Episode details come from the podcast's RSS feed.

Embed this episode

Ready to play

Major Moral Argument Mistakes (Part 2)

0:00 49:59

No transcript yet.

Requests help us decide what to transcribe next.

Frequently asked questions

How long is this episode of I Don't Have Enough FAITH to Be an ATHEIST?

This episode is 49 minutes long.

When was this I Don't Have Enough FAITH to Be an ATHEIST episode published?

This episode was published on October 25, 2019.

Can I download this I Don't Have Enough FAITH to Be an ATHEIST episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.