Major Moral Argument Mistakes (Part 2) episode artwork

EPISODE · Oct 25, 2019 · 49 MIN

Major Moral Argument Mistakes (Part 2)

from I Don't Have Enough FAITH to Be an ATHEIST

How good is the moral argument? A retired attorney wrote Frank asserting that we don’t need God for objective morality. Some of his challenges can be summarized in the following questions: • Does the moral argument depend on everyone agreeing on right and wrong? • Can human beings construct an objective moral standard independent of God? Couldn’t the majority vote do that? • Are God’s commands based on God’s desires? • Are they based on God’s authority? • Can’t evolution explain morality? • Do changing views on morality mean there is no objective morality? • What about moral dilemmas? Do they show morality is relative? Join Frank as he continues his response to these challenges.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Oct 25, 2019

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Major Moral Argument Mistakes (Part 2)

0:00 49:59

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of I Don't Have Enough FAITH to Be an ATHEIST?

This episode is 49 minutes long.

When was this I Don't Have Enough FAITH to Be an ATHEIST episode published?

This episode was published on October 25, 2019.

Can I download this I Don't Have Enough FAITH to Be an ATHEIST episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!