EPISODE · Sep 25, 2021 · 30 MIN
Mandatory BCD in Plea Agreements & Pt 2 of Impeachment with Prior Inconsistent Statement
from Litigator Libations · host Darrel-the-DCAP
Send us Fan MailIs it lawful to include a mandatory punitive discharge in a Plea Agreement, even when Congress hasn't determined that a punitive discharge is required for that offense? The second chapter addresses the "confirm" step in the impeachment of a witness using a prior inconsistent statement.
Embed this episode
NOW PLAYING
Mandatory BCD in Plea Agreements & Pt 2 of Impeachment with Prior Inconsistent Statement
0:00
30:26
1×
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
Viva Frei - Recovering Former Litigator! From Law to Politics & Beyond
David Freiheit
Viva Frei Podcast - Breaking down the law, democratizing information
Make No Law: The First Amendment Podcast
Legal Talk Network
Ken White explores the background of important First Amendment cases and the personalities and history that led to them. Join Ken, First Amendment litigator and law blogger at Popehat.com, as he interviews some of the people behind America’s most important free speech cases.
Charter: A Course - A podcast about Canadian Constitutional Law & Litigation
David Asper Center for Constitutional Rights
About the Series Charter: A Course is a podcast created by the David Asper Centre for Constitutional Rights (the Asper Centre) and hosted by the Asper Centre’s Executive Director Cheryl Milne. Charter: A Course focuses on Canadian constitutional law and litigation. In each episode, we highlight the accomplishments of U of T Law’s faculty and alumni involved in leading constitutional cases and issues. Each episode also includes a “Practice Corner,” where we talk about the ins and outs of what it means to be a constitutional litigator. Whether you are a law student, a lawyer, or just an interested person, we hope that you learn about an aspect of constitutional law and litigation that interests you in our podcast.
Picking Justice
Harry Plotkin & Dan Kramer
Attention Trial Lawyers: You’ve meticulously crafted your opening statement, mastered your directs and crosses, and fine-tuned your closing argument. But have you developed a strategy for jury selection? What will you do when a potential juror gives an unexpected answer? Do you even want that person on your jury? The clock is ticking — you need to think fast.Introducing Picking Justice, the essential podcast for trial lawyers. Join nationally renowned jury consultant Harry Plotkin and leading trial lawyer Dan Kramer as they guide you through the complex art of jury selection.Harry and Dan share invaluable insights and real-world strategies, breaking down the myths and misconceptions that often hold lawyers back in the courtroom.Whether you’re a seasoned litigator or preparing for your first big case, Picking Justice offers expert guidance to help you make smarter choices during jury selection.Subscribe today and elevate your trial skills with Picking Justice.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long is this episode of Litigator Libations?
This episode is 30 minutes long.
When was this Litigator Libations episode published?
This episode was published on September 25, 2021.
Can I download this Litigator Libations episode?
Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!