AI was supposed to take over the parts of the job you hate. Turns out made your job even harder. Instead of doing the work it gave you homework, ServiceNow's AI specialists get work done from start to finish. Cases get resolved, loops get closed.
With ServiceNow, you can do the parts of your job you're best at and delegate the rest. To put AI to work for people, visit ServiceNow.com this Sunday, fiscal fears. Concerns are rising about the U.S. economy and a possible recession amid new tariff threats.
We've been ripped off for years and we're not going to be ripped off anymore. It is a shakeup. And he said there's going to be a shakeup right now. Donald Trump has single handedly a bucket of ice water around the economy.
Billionaires win, families lose. I'll talk exclusively to the Treasury Secretary. Scott Besson and Steve Kornacki will reveal the results of our latest NBC News poll. Plus, divided Senate Democrats advance a Republican spending bill to avoid a government shutdown, but spark an intraparty battle in the process.
I will vote to keep the government open and not shut it down. I think there is a deep sense of outrage and betrayal. Is it time for new leadership in the Senate? Next question.
I'll talk to Democratic Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut. And at risk. The White House insists cuts to entitlement programs are off the table, but Elon Musk is fueling fears that benefits could get cut. Most of the federal spending, entitlements.
So that's like the big one to eliminate. Why isn't he here explaining it? You know why? Because he's out to privatize Social Security.
Joining me for insight and analysis are MSNBC senior Washington correspondent Eugene Daniels, Anna Palmer, co founder of Punchbowl News, Democratic pollster Cornell Belcher, and Republican strategist Sarah Fagan. Welcome to Sunday. It's Meet the Press from NBC News in Washington, the longest running show in television history. This is Meet the Press with Kristen Welker.
Good Sunday morning. We begin with our brand new NBC News poll, the biggest takeaway. President Trump is more popular than in his first term, but voters have soured on his handling of the economy, one of his signature issues. 54% of voters disapprove of the president's handling of the economy, the first time Mr.
Trump has ever had majority disapproval on the issue. In NBC News polling, just 18% of voters rate the economy is excellent or good, the lowest mark in our polling in more than a decade. The poll reflects an America that remains deeply divided. The president's approval rating 47%, is as high as it's ever been.
But a majority, 51%, disapprove of his performance. On Wednesday, the president argued his on again, off again tariff policy is not rattling financial markets. There's been a lot of on and off, some inconsistency. Inconsistency.
It's called flexibility. It's not, quote, inconsistency. It's called flexibility. Meanwhile, feelings toward the Democratic Party are at an historic low.
55% view the party negatively. And there's a divide among Democrats. On Friday, nine Democrats, led by Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Independent Angus King, who caucuses with them, voted with Republicans to advance a short term spending bill to keep the government open. As bad as the CR is, I believe allowing Donald Trump to take even much more power via a government shutdown is a far worse option.
A shutdown will allow DOGE to shift into overdrive. Now, before the vote, Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi released a statement defying Schumer writing, quote, democrats must not buy into this false choice. The party divisions were on display. Today was a bad day for the country.
And I won't sugarcoat it, today was also a bad day for the Democratic Party. In this case. CR stands for complete resignation. I think there is a deep sense of outrage and betrayal.
It's an unacceptable, unconscionable and un American spending bill. Is it time for new leadership in the Senate? Next question, what leverage do we have? Democrats keep showing up every night to fight with a casserole.
Joining me now to take us through our new poll numbers is NBC News national correspondent Steve Kornacki. Steve, a lot of headlines in this poll. Yeah, Chris, Vinnie gets to. Let's just start with Trump himself had 47% drop job approval rating.
Two ways of looking at this. First of all, you compare Trump to every recent president this point after coming into office. Trump's number here is the lowest, significantly the lowest, of any of his modern predecessors except Donald Trump in his first term. He was at 40% at this point in 2017.
So this for Trump is actually better at 47% than he's done. What that reflects is it's not that he's built a lot of new popularity since the election, but that coalition that elect them, you're not seeing that disappear from him at least. Yet there's some things driving that. First of all, the mood of the country.
This really jumped out. We asked folks, is down the right direction or the wrong direction? That 44% you say right direction. That's up since November.
And if that doesn't seem like a lot, the last time it cracked 40%. You gotta go back to 2012. The last time it actually hit 44 or January of 2004. So a lot of this is Republicans, but independents, that number is also up since the election on the direction of the country.
Also just Trump and his base. We monitor this among Republicans. Look at this. Basically, three out of four Republicans say it's a very positive view they have.
Trump, not just positive. Again, at this point in his first term, it was only 50. It's just the strengthening of that base, the tightness they feel in terms of their connection with him. And then there's the Trump agenda.
There are some popular elements of your handling of border security and the immigration issue. 55% approval that goes beyond his base. You see right there, you hear about Doge there in the setup. And broadly speaking, people do think this is a popular idea here, a good idea, 46%, bad idea, 40.
Look at it this way. We ask folks, what should Doge be doing going forward? A third say much more. 28% say Doge is needed, just needs to slow the pace down.
But that's 61% total who seem to say that Doge is basically a good thing and necessary thing right now, where it gets complicated for Trump, the man who's leading doge, negative, 51% majority, negative rating for Elon Musk, right here. Also federal workers. We just asked folks to have a positive, negative view, much more positive than negative in terms of federal workers. And for Trump, there is, we say, not slippage since the election, but the warning signs.
And it's on broader areas of his leadership. Look at this. In all of these areas, you see right here, Chris, in foreign policy, the Russian, Ukraine, war, majority disapproval at this point for Trump. And the economy is a red flag because that's the lowest number we have seen on the economy in the history of our poll.
For President Trump. That's right, in his first term, this was the exception. He had low numbers overall his first term, but not on the economy, but the economy and inflation this time. Look at those numbers and you look at the mood on the economy, only 18% of voters say excellent or good right now.
Our pollsters look at this right before the election, that number was 26%. Excellent, good before the election. So it has come down. And then he asked folks a little differently here.
It's what is Trump doing on inflation? His agenda, his approach. Are you satisfied what he's trying to do? 43% say they're satisfied, majority not satisfied.
And this is the real warning sign for the administration right now, independence. Basically three out of four not satisfied with the effort that's being put into the question of inflation right now. You look at things like this, you say it's politically bad news for Trump. It's probably good news for the Democrats.
They do lead our generic congressional ballot by a point. But they're also facing a very unique challenge in our poll right here, the view voters have of each party. Neither is good. But look at the numbers here for Democrats, 27% positive, more than double, 55% negative.
And we'll just put this on the graph for you in our poll here. This goes back a long ways and you can see the trend line for both parties. This is what's happened to the Democrats since the election. That is astonishing.
Steve, that's an historic low, right? That is. In more than 30 years of this poll, we've never seen either party hit a number this low in terms of negatives here. One thing to note on this with Democrats too, a lot of that negative rating, it's coming from Democrats themselves.
And a lot of that is coming from Democrats who say the party is being too cooperative in their view with Donald Trump. Interesting. A lot for both parties to chew on. Steve Konaki, great to see you.
Thanks so much. And joining me now is Treasury Secretary Scott Besson. Secretary Bessant, welcome to MEET THE press. Good to see you.
It's wonderful to have you here. Thank you for being here in person. Let's start off by talking about the big picture on the economy. A majority of Americans say they disapprove of President Trump's handling of the economy.
Consumer sentiment plunged this week to a 29 month low. JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs slashed growth expectations. Why are all of those folks wrong? And President Trump is right about his tariff policy.
Well, Chris, and thanks for having me here. And look what I am not going to say, that went on for a long time under the Biden administration and for a lot of the media and I'm not going to point fingers, but they used to say it was a vibe session and the American people don't know what they talk about. And Donald Trump, his administration, myself all believe that the American people know what they're feeling and we believe that our policies will change that. Clearly they are traumatized from what's happened with this affordability crisis that was brought on by the previous administration.
They want relief. We've been in for eight weeks. We are putting the policies in place that will make the affordability crisis go down, inflation moderate, and that as we set the sales. I am confident that the American people will come our way, even if some of the media narrative doesn't.
Well, and just to be clear, these are polls that are taken two months into President Trump's presidency. But let's talk about what happened in the stock market this week. Worst week for the market in two years. Does that worry you, Mr.
Secretary? Not at all. Been in the investment business for 35 years and I can tell you that corrections are healthy. They're normal.
What's not healthy is straight up that you get these euphoric markets. That's how you get a financial crisis. It would have been much healthier if someone had put the brakes on in 06 07. We wouldn't have had the problems in 08.
So I'm not worried about the markets over the long term. If we put good tax policy in place, deregulation and energy security, the markets will do great. I hear you say you're not worried about the markets, but nearly 60% of Americans are invested in the markets. That's their retirement savings.
What do you say to Americans who have real concerns that their retirement savings may be in jeopardy? I say that one week does not the market make. As Warren Buffett says, over the short term, the market is a going machine. Over the long term, it's a weighing machine.
And again, Kristen, it would have been very easy to come in, run these reckless policies that have been happening before. We've got these large government deficits, 6.7% of GDP. We've never seen this when we're not in wartime, not in recession. We are bringing those down in a responsible way.
We are going to have a transition and we are not going to have a crisis. Let me play you what some business leaders all around the country have had to say in response to President Trump's tariffs. Take a look. It would be difficult for US Farmers to try and get through some type of long term trade war that affects our bottom line.
Building the average house is going to cost more. I don't really understand the goal or the end play here and what's all trying to occur. Mr. Secretary, you heard that business owner say he doesn't understand the end goal of these tariffs.
So help bring some clarity if you can. Are these tariffs a temporary negotiating tactic or are they a perman here to stay? Thanks for the question. And I can tell you so April 2nd is going to be a big day.
We're going to roll out the reciprocal tariffs. But what I can tell you, and I would encourage your viewers and the public and the media to follow. Going into April 2, and already now we've seen some of our most imbalanced trading partners come forward and want to drop their tariffs. So by President Trump pushing forward with a tariff plan, reciprocal tariffs, if you drop yours, will drop ours.
We are already seeing some of the worst offenders come down. April 2nd is an important day. But I would also tell everyone to look what happens from April 2 to say June 30 as the other countries come down, too. And President Trump's created a win, win situation here.
Either the tariff barriers come down, the US can export more, trade is fairer. It's always been free, but not fair. And then we, or if they don't do it, we'll take in substantial revenues. I want to ask you about something that you actually said last week and we'll discuss it on the other side.
Take a look. Access to cheap goods is not the asset is not the essence of the American dream. The American dream is rooted in the concept that any citizen can achieve prosperity, upward mobility and economic security. Mr.
Secretary, are you there essentially saying that the Trump administration is comfortable to have consumers pay more for goods in America? Not at all. What I'm saying is the American dream is not let any flat screens that if Americans, if American families aren't able to afford a home, don't believe that their children will do better than they are. The American dream is not contingent on cheap bottles they have from China.
That it is more than that and we are focused on aff. But it's mortgages, it's cars, it's real wage gains. Do you acknowledge, though, that tariffs will ultimately drive up prices, at least in the short term? That's what economists, that's what business leaders, that's what CEOs say.
Well, they don't have to because I believe, especially with the China tariffs that Chinese manufacturers, they will eat, that will eat the price or eat the tariffs. I believe that the currency adjusts. And I believe if we look during President Trump's first term that the all the other things we do, if we're deregulating for getting energy prices down, then if we look across the spectrum, Americans will realize lower prices and better affordability. As you know, the administration has been pressed repeatedly on the prospects of a recession.
The messaging has been a little mixed. Let's look at some of what we've heard. I hate to predict things like that. There is a period of transition.
There's going to be no recession in America. Well, look, you can never predict the future, Mr. Secretary. Can you guarantee the American people here and now that there will be no recession on President Trump's watch?
You know, there are no guarantees like who would have predicted Covid. So I can predict that we are putting in robust policies that will be durable. And could there be an adjustment? Because I tell you, this massive government spending we had, that if that had kept going, we have to wean our country off of that.
And on the other side, we are going to invigorate the private sector. I am meeting with small bankers last week, and they are ready to start lending. And I can tell you that Main street is going to do well. What exactly do you mean when you say adjustment?
Could that potentially lead to a recession? There's no reason that it has to. But I can tell you that if we kept on this track, what I could guarantee is we would have had a financial crisis. I've studied it, I've taught it.
And if we kept up at these spending levels, that everything was unsustainable. So we're putting that we are resetting and we are putting things on a sustainable path. Let me ask you about some of these cuts to the federal government. Obviously, President Trump's been very clear.
He thinks that no agency should be spared a lot of focus on the irs. How much of the workforce do you think will be cut from the irs? Well, again, and I used to, when I was on the other side of the wall, I don't like the term fake news. Now that I'm on the inside, I gotta say, it might not be strong enough, because some of the numbers that I've seen thrown out.
I didn't give you a number. I'm letting you tell me. You tell me. But some very large print media has thrown out big numbers that just doesn't exist.
What is the number? That's what I want to ask you. Well, I will tell you that there were about 15,000 probationary employees that we could have let go. We kept about 7,500, 8,500, because we view them as essential to the mission.
And we will know once we get inside. But what I can tell you is that we are doing a big review. We're not doing anything. We're not doing anything right now.
It's playoff season for us. April 15th is game day. And even employees who could take voluntary retirement, the rest of the federal workforce, their date was in February. Our date for them is in May.
So I have three priorities for the irs. Collections, privacy and customer service. And we'll see what level is needed to prioritize all those. Okay, well, we'll stay on top of that review for sure.
I do want to ask you about the breaking news overnight. The Trump administration launching large scale military strikes against Yemen's Iranian backed Houthis. What exactly is the message that President Trump is trying to send to Iran? So it's a very strong message and very different than the previous administration.
So the Houthis, the Iranians should expect that this is the beginning. This is not a one off. And we are doing this because they are blocking freedom of passage for global shipping. And back to the economy, back to inflation.
That closing the Suez Canal slows global commerce and increases inflationary pressure for both us and our allies. So we are sending a message. This is unacceptable. Two weeks ago, the president announced a maximum pressure strategy on Iran.
Their economy is in disarray. The previous administration let their oil exports go up to about 1.5 million a day. And our target is to get it to zero. Okay.
Secretary Bessant, thank you so much for being here. Covered a lot of ground this morning. Really appreciate it. Thanks, Kristen.
Good to see you. And when we come back, Democratic Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut joins me next. Welcome back. And joining me now is Democratic Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut.
Senator Murphy, welcome back to Meet the Press. Yeah, thanks for having me. Thank you so much for being here. We really appreciate it.
Let's talk about this extraordinary week on Capitol Hill. You voted no on the government funding bill that could have led to a shutdown. Ten Democrats, led by leader Chuck Schumer voted to advance the spending package to keep the government open. Leader Schumer took to the floor to defend his decision.
I want to play a little bit, get your reaction on the other side. As bad as the CR is, I believe allowing Donald Trump to take even much more power via a government shutdown is a far worse option. A shutdown would allow DOGE to shift into overdrive, Senator. Leadership, remember?
So let's go back for a second. This is not a normal political moment. It's not a normal political fight. What Donald Trump is doing right now is absolutely insidious.
He is every single day acting unconstitutionally. He is trying to destroy the rule of law. And for what? To essentially hand our government over to the billionaire class so that they can steal from us.
There is a level of corruption happening in this White House that is absolutely unprecedented. And so this to me is a moment where we need to be restraining the president's power, not giving him new authorities. And for Those of us that voted against this budget bill, part of our worry is that it does give the President new authority to move money around, new authority to. To begin new programming cuts, some essential services for the poor and the middle class.
And while I totally understand my colleagues who didn't want to catapult us into a shutdown, I actually think that the American people would have understood that Republicans have an obligation to negotiate with Democrats. This is the first full year spending bill since I've been in Congress that was written only by the Republican Party. So, yes, it would have been a risk. I understand the decision that many of my Democratic colleagues made.
But I think the American people want us to take risks right now in order to save our democracy. Senator, based on my conversations with some of your colleagues who voted to keep the government open, they say you just didn't have any leverage. What leverage did Democrats have to extract concessions from Republicans in this moment? Well, again, this is the first time that a full year spending bill has passed without it being agreed upon by both parties.
So certainly in the past, the minority party has used its leverage in the Senate in order to get a seat at the table. Again, I understand the danger of a shutdown right now. But as we saw just hours after that bill passed the Senate, the President is continuing to act unconstitutionally. He shut down some of our most important programs that protect us abroad, like Radio Free Asia, Radio Free Europe, that were funded and authorized in that spending bill.
So by passing the spending bill, it doesn't seem that we have restrained any of the President's lawlessness. You have spoken forcefully in the past, actually, against shutting down the government. I want to play a little bit of that sound for you. Take a look.
This is just no time to be playing around with people's lives. We need to start acting like adults. We need to start doing the job that we were sent here to do because our nation's security is at stake. It's hard to explain the ramifications of a shutdown, but they're enormous.
Head Start programs won't open. Soldiers won't get paid for defending this country. The consequences are absolutely devastating. And yet you say Americans would have understood this time what changed?
Senator, listen, I don't think Americans would have understood, but they would have understood why we got there. If you are the majority party, you have an obligation to negotiate with the minority. Republicans refuse to do that again. Never before has a spending bill been written by only one party.
And at this moment, when the President is acting so unconstitutionally, it just seems like the Absolute wrong time to give him these new powers. Listen, I understand that a no vote was a risk, right? But I think, I think the American public right now want us to stand up Democrats to stand up and take some risks every single day. The President is engaging in exceptional tactics in risk tolerant behavior.
And I don't think you save the Republic and save our democracy by playing it straight and maintaining norms when the President is shattering them every single day. You know, Secretary of Nancy Pelosi broke with Leader Schumer's strategy in an extraordinary moment. House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries was asked if he has confidence in Leader Schumer. And he said next question.
Effectively dodged the question multiple times. So let me put this question to you. Do you have confidence in Leader Schumer's leadership? So Leader Schumer has a very difficult job.
I don't envy the job that he has. And the question is really for the members of his Democratic caucus, are we willing to fight? Right. I admit that it would take some risk tolerant behavior in order to effectively stand up to this President.
And so the question really is for my party writ large, are we willing to do the very difficult things necessary to meet this moment. Do you think that Schumer is the best person to lead your cause in this moment? Senator Schumer certainly can lead this caucus. He can lead this caucus.
But we need to have a conversation inside the caucus about whether we are willing to stand up to Republicans. Listen, we have options. We could decide to not proceed to legislation as an ordinary course of business. There are big fights ahead of us like the debt ceiling, like another potential government shutdown in six months.
So we have opportunities as a caucus to stand up and meet this moment. I think the American people are demanding that we do that. Just yes or no before we move on. Do you have confidence in leadership?
I still support support Senator Schumer as leader. But I think the only way that we are going to be effective as a caucus is if we change our tactics. And we have to have a conversation inside our caucus to make sure that we are going to do that. So let's talk about that.
You posted a video explaining your vote, what you call a very difficult moment. Many of your supporters responded online saying you should replace Leader Schumer. Is that something that you would consider? Would you consider that role?
I don't think anybody's having that conversation right now. What's important is that we meet this moment. And what I'm telling you is that if we continue to observe norms, if we continue to engage in business as usual, this democracy could be gone. I don't think we have a year to save American democracy.
I think the way the president is acting, using law enforcement to target dissidents, harassing TV stations, radio stations that criticize him, endorsing political violence puts our democracy at immediate risk. So if you are a Democrat in the Senate or in the House, you have to start acting with urgency. And that is the conversation that we have to start having inside our caucus. Our new NBC News poll, as you just saw, shows the Democratic Party at an all time low approval rating.
Why do you think Democrats are failing to connect with Americans at this critical moment of urgency that you described? Well, it's what I just talked about. I mean, I think Americans want the Democratic Party to stand up and fight and to take risks. Listen, I understand that had we gone into a shutdown, even for a handful of days, it would have been difficult, but it would have sent a message that the Democratic Party is not going to be bullied by Donald Trump.
We are not going to let them write spending bills unilaterally to cut programs for people we care about that give the president knew an extraordinary power. I think Democrats in this country, but I think the broad middle of the public as well, want to see our party fighting in exceptional ways. That is the conversation that has to happen inside of the Democratic Party, inside our caucus. And if we don't get that right, if we continue to work with Republicans, if we continue to hand out Trump more power, we are going to lose our democracy.
All right. Well, Senator Murphy, thank you so much. Please keep us posted on those conversations. Come back soon to update us.
Thank you very much for being here. We really appreciate it. And when we come back, how will President Trump respond to growing warning signs on the economy? The panel's next.
Get the best of NBC News with a subscription viewer ads fee for access and exclusive content. And now during the Xfinity member celebration, members can get an exclusive 50 off an annual subscription. Head to xfinity.com membership to learn more. Xfinity Imagine that subscription automatically renews each year at 6,559 plus access and fees until canceled.
Hotter ends May 20, 2026. Price is subject to change. Visit nbcnews.comxinnity for full offer terms and details. Welcome back.
The panel is here. Eugene Daniels, MSNBC senior Washington correspondent and incoming co host of the Weekend Anna Palmer, CEO and founder of Punchbowl News, Democratic pollster Cornell Belcher and Republican strategist Sarah Fagan. Thanks to all of you for being here after a very busy week. My goodness, Eugene, I'll have to guess you.
Let me have you kick it off here. 54 of voters say they disapprove of President Trump's handling of the economy. What were some of your key takeaways from this as it relates to the president and his first two months in office? Yeah, I think warning signs, right?
I think for Donald Trump, he can look at what Joe Biden went through and learn a lot of lessons. We were in briefing rooms together, we were covering the White House, and we heard over and over age to President Biden saying, laughing at us. We asked about inflation, whether it was an issue for Joe Biden. This feels like that moment.
The difference is that Donald Trump understands people's feelings are sometimes more important than anything when they're voters. And so the key is one, the policy has to move and make things better, but they have to also have to explain to people showing their work what they're doing. I think that's the thing that they have to focus on moving forward. That's a really important point, explaining so important to the American people.
Sarah, let's talk about some of the other numbers. 71% of Republicans say they identify with the MAGA brand, but only 28% of independents feel positively toward President Trump. We are really seeing what we've been reporting on for months, which is this coalescing when it comes to Republicans around President Trump. But when it comes to independence, he does have a challenge.
Yeah, I think he does. I think in part because they were rented voters. Right. You know, many of the independents voted for Donald Trump because they didn't like the Democrats, they didn't support Joe Biden.
So it's not surprising that when you have a few weeks of economic turmoil in the news that they're going to go back to a position of disfavor, so to speak. I don't think the White House is looking at poll numbers right now. I believe that when you talk to people there, they have a once in a generation opportunity to reform government, to rethink the way the government takes in revenues and supports the programs that people need. And that's what they're focused on.
The question is how much Runway do they have Cornell pick up there? Let's talk about what we're seeing for the Democrats, historic low numbers. And it comes against the backdrop of this extraordinary fight that we saw play out. You saw Senator Murphy saying, we've got to move in a different direction and our democracy depends on.
He said in a year the democracy could be gone. Actually this is really important conversation that I wish we had more time for one thing, I think Republicans, the White House might not be looking at it. If you're a House Republican and a tough swing seat, you gotta be looking at it. Right.
He's gone from an MBC's polling from a majority approving of sanity economy to now underwater approving of his economy. And that number on inflation is minus 13. Overall it's minus 36among or 32among independent voters. That middle of the road voter that House Republicans are absolutely gonna need.
They are watching what we're doing on inflation. And you also see NBC polling how majority don't think they're focused at all enough on actually fighting inflation. So it may not be a problem with the White House. If I'm running for a seat as a Republican and this coming midterm, I would be very concerned about it on the Democrat side.
I think we're a real important inflection point for the Democrats. Right. I think that conversation. I know we'll get to that conversation with Senator here in a moment.
But when you look at the collapse of that Democrat positive. Right. If you look at independent voters. Right.
Independent voters underwater 32, 36 points. Democrats where Republicans independent voters underwater around roughly the same mark. This problem isn't with basin core, the Democrat Party. They are far underwater with young voters.
As I've seen. I work for Obama. I'm not seeing Democrats as far underwater. Only 49% of African Americans have a positive view of it.
So a lot of this is really around the core. And these young voters in that fight that you see happening right now is really sort of encapsulating the problem for Democrats. Yeah. And at the root of the problem for both parties and it is the economy, the frustration that people feel that they haven't started to see prices come down yet under President Trump, the frustration that they feel about the disunity in the Democratic Party.
And you have heard Senator Murphy say he thinks that they should have taken the risk and move forward with shutting down the government. I thought his comments around Leah Schumer were pretty fascinating as well. Yeah, absolutely. And I think you were seeing such frustration with Chuck Schumann, really, all the Democrats channeling their frustration with the fact that they didn't, they don't have a unified message.
They haven't found a way to go up against this president in an effective way and to bring along kind of the base of their party. You know, whether it was, you know, the senator today or if you look at What House Minority leader? You play the sound of that next question. That is stunning.
In 20 years of reporting on Capitol Hill, you have never seen the kind of intra party fight yet, honestly, in that dramatic fashion. Eugene, talk about that extraordinary moment. I asked Senator Murphy a couple different times if he had confidence in Schumer. Eventually he got there and said, yes, yes, but it took a couple of tries.
But with Hakeem, Jeffrey's boy, that was stunning when he wouldn't just say, yes, I have confidence in my colleague. Or he could have said ridiculous question instead of next question. Right. There's so many ways to get out of that that all of these politicians understand and have been doing it for a long time, as we all know.
So the fact that he did it makes very clear a couple things. The frictions that have been playing out behind the scenes between Schumer and Jeffries, the kind of different leaders they are. Schumer kind of sees Jeffries as like this new guy who has a lot to learn in leadership. And Jeffrey C.
Seems as like an old guy who probably learned too much and he needs to listen to the party a little bit more. So that playing out is exactly why when I talk to Democrats, they say that this is going to get worse before it gets better for them. It's gonna get way worse. I mean, look, the Democratic party is maybe 10, 15 years behind where the Republicans were.
You go back to what's next? Well, you go back to 2010 and 1112 when we had put forward all these candidates in primaries where a electable Republican lost Republicans. It took much longer to take back the Senate. And you can look at that parallel here where the left flank is upset.
They're threatening primaries. If that happens, it'll be a long time before Democrats take control of the US Senate irrespective of what happens in this economy. I think we're. I'm shocked at the bubbling up outrage such as the grassroots.
I really am. This is a watershed moment and I feel this way. This is worship moment for now, but also I think 2028. Right.
I'm not seeing this sort of divide since vote on the Iraq war. Right. And it was the old school establishment versus the young enough comers who said that was the wrong vote. I think when you look forward, this is gonna be a moment where the younger sort of grassroots and sort of energized core of the base of the party goes.
That is a defining moment. If you're on the wrong side of fighting and taking on Trump there, it's a being on the wrong side of the rock wall. I think you capsulate it by saying it is a watershed moment. So much more to discuss.
Please stick around, guys. When we come back, the battle's over government shutdown and the lessons learned. Army. The president is next.
Welcome back. While Congress avoided a government shutdown this week, it's a reminder of how a single procedural vote on federal spending can bring Washington to a standstill. In 1995, President Bill Clinton and Republicans led by Speaker Newt Gingrich were deadlocked in a budget showdown, triggering what was then the longest government shutdown in US History. Days before the first of two shutdowns over the 1996 federal budget, Speaker Gingrich joined the press.
How long are you prepared to leave the government shut down? Weeks. Necessary. I would like to have the president sign a bill tomorrow morning.
The government won't shut down at all. I'm not prepared to shut down at all. We are doing our job. We're sending a continuing resolution.
All we got to do is sign it and the government stays open. So we don't want to shut down at all. Last Sunday, I asked Senator Dole if the government shut down, who'd get blamed? And he said, all of us.
Gingrich, Dolan, Clinton. I agree with that. I think, I think it is a tragedy that we're in a situation where we can't find a way to talk this through. I think Senator Dole and I have spent the whole week doing what he suggested, and that is reaching out, offering to meet, offering to talk, offering to negotiate.
And on every turn, we've been turned down the White House. It's truly compared to normal patterns in Washington. It is sort of extraordinary. When we come back, what Americans negative views of Elon Musk mean for President Trump.
More with the panel next. The reason for entitlement spending, which is one of the, which is most of federal spending, is entitlements. So that's like the big ones. Eliminate.
Welcome back. The panel is still here and up on President Trump has said entitlements will not be touched. And there you heard Elon Musk say it's the big one. It's what's fueling most of government spending.
So what are your sources telling you about how this is going to play out? I mean, it is the big one. But it's also why you saw the Trump administration pull back from anything to Medicare or Medicaid, because those are kind of the third way. Republicans don't want to be talking about that.
But we were speaking to Republican senators I think two things really, starting this week. One, they are still on board with what this administration is doing. They go back home. Cutting wasteful, fraudulent spending plays really well.
And I think the second thing is really interesting. As his Cabinet secretary has come on board, the wings of Elon Musk are being clipped. And Elon Musk is also coming to the Hill. He came talking Republicans, gave them his cell phone number and said, if you have a problem with something cut in your state, in your district, get in touch.
That is some hand in hand that you don't typically see from administration. Eugene, we felt exactly what Anna's saying, that Elon Musk's wings had been clipped. In a response that Secretary Besent had, when I asked him, how big are the cuts going to be, the irs, he said, we're going to launch a review. Elon Musk was not launching reviews.
He's just slashing things. I mean, it's a very different approach that he revealed it is because it shows that the blowback that came from the speed at which Elon Musk and Doja operating, kind of the chaos that was creating, created something the administration did not like. Something Donald Trump did not like. Right.
It's why there was that blow up at that Cabinet meeting where Donald Trump told the Cabinet secrets, you're in charge. Elon's like a helper. Right. Ben actually kind of had to tussle publicly with Elon before.
Right. He in February had to say, no, he's not in our systems in the way that he's. He and the Doge kids are kind of saying. And so that shows the frustration that had been building in the secretaries who want to run their own departments is coming out.
And now Donald Trump is changing things because of it. Yeah. I mean, I think if you look at the poll, 2, nearly 2/3 of people support the tenants of Doge and some will argue go faster, some will argue go slower. I think the most important thing the White House and Elon Musk need to do is come up with a more conservative narrative about the arc of why this needs to happen and a process.
And I think that, you know, also in that poll, I was struck by the number of people who claim to know somebody who's been impacted by a government reduction cut or something, you know, pushing 30%. That includes a lot of people, including probably farmers, who are worried about tariffs. But nonetheless, this is out in the mainstream and people are worried about it. They support it, they understand understand it, but they want to.
They need to hear a consistent, clear message. From the government that disconnect where the administration is not doing enough to explain exactly what they're doing. I think you take an eye of the prize, right? Sure.
Generically, everyone's for, you know, getting waste out of government. Right. Who's not for getting weights out of government? For four months going up to the election, we sat around the table talking about inflation, the price of eggs, Inflation, the price of eggs.
And 55% of Americans in IBC polling says that they've not done enough to focus on bringing down, bringing down, bringing down costs. It's an opening for Democrats. It is absolutely an opening for Democrats. And look and hear secretaries surrounding people talk about how they've been focused on economy, bringing down costs and what have they been doing to do it.
If I look at what they've been most focused on from day one, quite frankly, is diversity. Right. It's quite frankly going after diversity and going after equity a lot more than they've gone after cutting the price of eggs. Spend as much time on price as eggs as they going after diversity.
Eggs might be free at this point. One of the striking moments of this week was the moment where President Trump basically had a car show at the White House. Tesla's on display with Elon Musk. It comes as for says Tesla sales have been dropping Elon Musk's approval ratings much lower than President Trump's, by the way, the optics of this and is it complicated for the White House?
Well, it's amazing that they're doubling down on Elon Musk because to Cornell's point, this is the opening for Democrats are already starting to run ads featuring Elon Musk as the bully man. This gives them the B roll and the visual. You need to say that the White House is, you know, kind of mixing business with. With the work of the government usually.
We should note that President Biden did actually have electric cars at the White House as well. So we've seen this Tesla. Yeah, yeah. And that's what makes it so complicated.
In this case, you have Elon Musk who works at the White House, the president, Sean. Well, so I looked at that and I thought there's so many parallels between how Donald Trump sees himself and I think how he sees Elon Musk. Here's a person who's wealthy, who's wildly successful, has great property. At least.
At least Donald Trump has great property, doesn't need to do this. Is doing this because they believe the country is headed in the wrong direction and they have a unique ability to come impact and improve It. And then they had been vilified. Donald Trump is vilified for what he tried to do.
And he sees Elon Musk being vilified in that parallel. And Tesla stock is dropping nearly 50% since Christmas. He's paying a price for his involvement, and he doesn't need to do it. Poor Elon.
Richest man in the world, Elon. I think it's. I hear you on that, but he doesn't need to do it. Most Americans are arguing to we don't want you to do it.
Now, I'm not sure if that's true. You look at two thirds of the country believes the government needs to be reformed. And so at great personal risk for his businesses, he's doing this. He's all acknowledged there have been mistakes.
Is there a way he's doing it? And by the way, you know, a billionaire is not someone that most Americans think understands their way of life, understands the programs and things in the government that actually help them. And you know what he's showing? He's showing that he does not, in fact, understand sort of what mainstream America is focused on.
Right. And the idea that what Biden did at the White House is similar to Trump basically being a salesman hawking a Tesla on the front lawn of the White House is completely different. The ad writes itself. The Democrats aren't doing it immediately.
The next day, there should have been just that ad. When you talk to them behind the scenes, they explain the Elon overall in a much better way than they do when they go on television. They don't talk about him as an oligarch behind the scenes. Right.
They talk about him as someone who is, in their eyes, doing this, doing Doge, because he wants to help his businesses. At the end of the day, right. They're talking about that conflict of interest. That's something that the American people actually understand.
But they again, continue to miss an opportunity. And a final 30 seconds. The relationship between Trump and thus one of the most extraordinary, and I'm told his local numbers actually helps that solidify that relationship. I mean, we've all been watching so closely.
When is this gonna go up, right? Famously. And so far, I think Circle points out, they're really similar figures. And this is the only time you've seen Trump do an interview with US Cabinet.
Let him speak like this. It's pretty astounding. And we all be watching this. How long it works.
We certainly will. What a great conversation, guys. Thank you so much. That is all for today.
Thank you so much for watching. We will be back next week, because if it's Sunday, it's Meet the Press. He was a young Marine. She didn't care about convention.
They made a life together. Then one night, the Marine died. And then the death investigation took a wild, unexpected, and utterly bizarre turn. I'm Josh Makois, and this is Trace of Suspicion, an only podcast from Daylight.
Listen to all episodes of Trace of Suspicion. Now, wherever you get your podcasts,