Marxists Suck at Trucking in California

California's strict regulations on diesel trucks, particularly those built before 2010 and the mandate for zero-emission new truck purchases, aim to significantly reduce air pollution and promote cleaner transportation. However, these policies come with complex economic implications for both California and the broader U.S. economy, impacting GDP, unemployment, and inflation, as well as the practicalities of the trucking industry. Cost of New Diesel vs. EV Trucks The upfront cost of an electric truck is generally higher than that of a comparable diesel truck. While exact figures vary by class and manufacturer, some sources indicate that electric trucks can be up to three times the price of diesel trucks initially. However, studies from institutions like UC Berkeley suggest that long-haul electric trucks are becoming increasingly cost-competitive, potentially being 13% cheaper to own today and nearly 50% cheaper by 2030 when considering the total cost of ownership (TCO), primarily due to lower fuel and maintenance expenses. For example, a Class 5 electric truck might have lower operational costs for driving 50 miles ($6.58 USD for charging) compared to a diesel truck ($18.56 USD for fuel), assuming national average electricity and diesel prices in the U.S. (as of March 2025). This can be offset by more expensive DC fast charging, which might cost $12.90 for 50 miles. These operational savings are a key driver for the projected long-term TCO parity or advantage of EVs. Scarcity of Truckers, Products, and Consumer Prices in CA The transition to zero-emission trucks (ZETs) could exacerbate existing challenges in the trucking industry, potentially leading to a scarcity of truckers and products, and subsequently higher consumer prices in California. Scarcity of Truckers: The high upfront cost of ZETs, coupled with the need for new charging infrastructure, could make it difficult for small and independent owner-operators to comply. This financial burden, alongside existing issues like driver misclassification and high operating costs in California, might force some truckers out of business or out of the state, leading to a reduction in the available trucking workforce. A shortage of drivers, already a concern in the industry, would intensify. Scarcity of Products: A reduced fleet size or increased operational delays due to charging needs could disrupt the supply chain. This means fewer trucks available to move goods from ports to warehouses and then to retail shelves. Such disruptions inevitably lead to product shortages or delays. Impact on Consumer Prices: When the supply of goods is constrained, and the costs of transportation increase (due to higher truck prices, infrastructure investments, or potential downtime for charging), these expenses are typically passed on to the consumer. One analysis suggests that an 80% increase in trucking costs could translate to a 3.6% increase in the cost of goods and services for California households, representing an average of $2,500 in additional annual expenditures to maintain the same standard of living. This acts like a regressive tax, disproportionately affecting lower-income households. EV Truck Limitations and Infrastructure Challenges While promising, EV trucks currently face significant limitations compared to their diesel counterparts, especially for long-haul operations: Lower Carrying Capacity: Despite a 2,000-pound federal weight allowance for battery-electric heavy trucks, EV semi-trucks on average still require sacrificing approximately 5,000 pounds of cargo-carrying capacity due to the weight of their batteries. This means less freight can be hauled per trip, potentially requiring more trucks for the same volume of goods, or limiting the types of cargo that can be economically transported. Limited Range and Charging Infrastructure: The range of current long-haul EV trucks (e.g., Tesla Semi's estimated 300 or 500 miles) is often less than a diesel truck's range on a full tank. More critically, the charging infrastructure for heavy-duty EV trucks is still in its nascent stages. Lack of Widespread Charging Stations: There is currently no widespread network of high-power charging stations suitable for 18-wheelers, particularly along critical long-haul routes. Existing chargers are often not "pull-through," requiring unhitching, and slower, making efficient long-distance travel challenging. Charging Time: Recharging a heavy-duty EV truck can take significantly longer than refueling a diesel truck, leading to increased downtime for drivers and potentially impacting delivery schedules. While some EV trucks can regain a substantial portion of their range in 30-45 minutes with fast charging, this is still longer than a typical fuel stop. Joliet, Illinois Study and CA Power Grid Impact A multi-state transportation electrification impact study conducted by Kevala, in partnership with the U.S. Department of Energy, included analysis for states like California and Illinois. While specific findings for Joliet, Illinois, aren't directly translated to California's grid, the study provides insights into the demands of heavy-duty EV charging. Significant Power Draw: Fast-charging a single Class 8 semi-truck can require at least 350 kilowatts of power. A large charging station catering to multiple heavy-duty trucks simultaneously could demand 20 megawatts (MW) of power or more. To put this in perspective, charging four or five electric trucks at once is comparable to plugging in 100 Tesla Model Ys simultaneously. Strain on the Grid: This immense power demand will necessitate substantial upgrades to the electrical grid, including transmission and distribution infrastructure. If California's electrical grid expansion fails to keep up with the electricity demand from widespread EV truck adoption, it could lead to: Electricity Rationing/Load Shifting: Mandated by grid operators, which would further hamper fleet operations and raise trucking costs. Widespread Electricity Supply Disruptions or Blackouts: More severe problems could emerge, causing product shortages and price spikes. Increased Utility Rates: The significant investment required for grid upgrades will likely contribute to higher electricity costs for all consumers in California. Potential Job Losses for California Businesses Quantifying specific job losses attributable solely to California's strict trucking guidelines is challenging, as the trucking industry is influenced by many factors (e.g., freight rates, driver shortages, automation). However, concerns exist regarding job displacement: Small Business Impact: Small trucking companies and independent owner-operators, who often operate on thin margins, are particularly vulnerable to the high costs of compliance and new equipment. The regulations could lead to business closures and a reduction in self-employed truckers, impacting jobs for drivers, dispatchers, and administrative staff associated with these businesses. Transition Period Challenges: While new jobs are expected in the EV manufacturing and infrastructure sectors, there's a transition period where skills may not perfectly align. Diesel mechanics may need retraining to work on electric powertrains, for instance. Overall Economic Downturn: If the regulations lead to significant increases in transportation costs and consumer prices, it could reduce overall economic activity in California, indirectly affecting job creation across various sectors. While specific, universally agreed-upon numbers for job losses are difficult to pinpoint, the potential for a substantial impact on small trucking businesses and related jobs is a recurring concern raised by industry groups. The long-term success of these regulations in California, and their influence on the U.S., hinges on how effectively the state and industry can address the economic challenges, particularly in terms of reducing the upfront cost of ZETs, rapidly building out robust charging infrastructure, and managing the demands on the power grid without disproportionately burdening businesses and consumers. Hello, and thanks for listening to my podcast For years, my mission has been to foster a community around engagement, unique takes on interesting stories, and conversation. If you value what I do, please consider supporting me. I've started a GoFundMe to cover my production and operational costs, including those pesky social media fees. If you can’t contribute to my GoFundMe, I get it, but you can help me by subscribing to my account or sharing this particular story with friends and family that you think would appreciate it. Your contribution, big or small, helps me keep going. Thank you. GO FUND ME