Merchan Desperately Tries To Kamala-ize Himself

Now comes news that Judge Juan Merchan, the judge in the ridiculous Trump “hush money” trial, has delayed sentencing in that case until after the November 5th General Election. Well, well, well… I guess he’s doing his best, “I was against fracking before I was for fracking,” Kamala-ala-ala-chameleon impersonation.Merchan tried like hell to distance himself from the negative ramifications of his wholly partisan and political persecution of Donald Trump, repercussions that saw even liberal legal scholars like Alan Dershowitz saying there was absolutely no basis for Alvin Bragg’s indictment to have come to trial. In his statement announcing the decision said:“Adjourning decision on the motion and sentencing, if such is required, should dispel any suggestion that the Court will have issued any decision or imposed sentence either to give an advantage to, or to create a disadvantage for, any political party and/or any candidate for any office…Unfortunately, we are now at a place in time that is fraught with complexities rendering the requirements of a sentencing hearing, should one be necessary, difficult to execute…”That Merchan said twice in his statement, “if such is necessary” and “should one be necessary,” alludes to the idea that one won’t be necessary. That idea – in and of itself – would prove that Merchan engaged in overt election interference by allowing the case to go forward at all. That, and his bizarre and partisan – and judicially unethical – behavior during the trial, should spur the process for removing Merchan from the bench for misconduct.Am I being partisan in my thoughts about Merchan? No. I am pointing out that when politics of a partisan nature interferes with the blind application of the law, it needs to have extreme consequences. Quite frankly, the same process should be initiated against Alvin Bragg for his prosecutorial misconduct in literally creating a crime when one not only didn’t exist but where other authoritative bodies with purview over the issue established that no crime had been committed.This is what the pundits and potentates mean by the political Left weaponizing the judiciary. It started quietly with the insertion of politics into decisions made from the bench and has now metastasized into a full-blown Third World cancer of political persecution for electoral advantage.The Executive and Legislative Branches of our federal government have been lost to partisan politics and Deep State influence for over 100 years; with the eruption of Marxist-based Progressivism and Woodrow Wilson, may he rot in Hell for what he did to our Republic.But the judiciary – the Judicial Branch – isn’t too far gone to salvage. That effort starts with removing federally appointed judges, through the impeachment process, for bad behavior in employing partisan politics – whether overtly or clandestinely, into their proceedings and decisions.And, to be clear, US Supreme Court justices can be impeached. The US Constitution allows SCOTUS justices and federal judges to serve only in times of “good behavior,” as stated in Article III, Section 1.Of course, engaging in this process would mean electing people who aren’t afraid to take on the Deep State, K Street, and both political parties, and that, my friends, requires some balls. I suppose that’s why the Deep State, the Marxist Democrats, and the pussies of the Never Trumpers are so incredibly terrified of Donald Trump.They should be.Then, when we come back, our segment on America’s Third Watch, broadcast nationally from our flagship station WGUL AM860 & FM93.7 in Tampa, Florida. Get full access to Underground USA at www.undergroundusa.com/subscribe