EPISODE · Nov 6, 2013
Mississippi, ex rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp.
from U.S. Supreme Court 2013 Term Arguments
A case in which the Court ruled that, in order for a case to be removed to a federal district court instead of a state court under the Class Action Fairness Act, at least 100 people must be represented by the lawsuit.
Embed this episode
Ready to play
Mississippi, ex rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp.
0:00
0:00
1×
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.
Frequently Asked Questions
When was this U.S. Supreme Court 2013 Term Arguments episode published?
This episode was published on November 6, 2013.
Can I download this U.S. Supreme Court 2013 Term Arguments episode?
Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!