Everybody needs money. That's why they call it money. Oh, best thing they'll like our free, but you can get up to the price. From full global headquarters, this is Motley Cool Money.
Fun with Motley Cool Money. Thanks for being here on your host, Chris Helen. Joining me in studio this week for Motley Cool Hidden Gems, Seth Jason, from Motley Cool In-Dome, Ambassador James Early, and from Million Dollar Portfolio, Ron Gross. Guys, good to see you as always.
We have got the latest on Amazon, Apple, Bank of America, and more, and we've also got a few stocks on our radar. But we begin with the big macro. Lots of headlines this week, guys. We've got US mortgage rates falling to a record low.
The stock market's lousy third quarter is literally coming to an end, and we have the EU and Greece getting one step closer to having a bailout situation. Let's just go around the table. James, I'll start with you. What's your headline of the week?
What do you think is most significant for investors? Chris, this is an employment-based recession. That's oversimplifying it a little bit, but there's power over supplication. And this week we actually saw fewer unemployment claims.
So one data point enough is not enough to really make or break anything, but that could be the start of something big, because that's really the thing that separates this from previous recessions is so long after the fact we still have high unemployment. Ron, Chris, whenever we talk big macro, I always feel like I'm kind of doom and gloom, because you know, things happen that could be worse. I'm going the other way today. Buffett came out this morning and he said the chance of a US recession is very, very unlikely.
And in fact, he's bought $4 billion worth of common stock this quarter on the weakness. That made me feel just a little bit better. I know you didn't refer to him as Mr. Broke.
I sometimes do. Is that the same shirt you had on last week? I'm not sure. I have to be honest with you.
This is my radio shirt. Ron reserves the phrase Mr. for just one C. only.
That's a Jim Cinekal of Costco. Mr. Cineal to you. Seth Jason, your headline this week.
I'm a little embarrassed. I got this wrong. I prepared an answer on the Big Marco. No, no, no.
My favorite Italian wrestler. No, no, big macro. I think the thing stood out for me was the GDP revision. This is a revision to 1.3% annual rate for quarter two of this year instead of the previously reported 1.0%.
That might not sound like a big increase, but it is. And if things are a little better than they seem, that would be good. We also had a small uptick in consumer sentiment. So these things help.
They go with what James said. And remember, recessions are primarily, they're economic events, but they're driven by psychology. Do Italians really have wrestling? Is there a big Marco?
Does it go Roman wrestling? No, these days. It doesn't seem very European. Oh, they can do like an Olympic team and all that stuff.
Or do you think it's like a W? Yeah, yeah. It's a guy that Rey Mysterio. He's a man.
Stop your head. Wow. Mexico, Italy. Do we have a wrestling segment for Ron now?
Let's get Ron's very Italian wrestling fans. Please write us here. What is it? Radio at phone.
Radio at phone. Absolutely. All right, guys. The big company story this week on Wednesday, Amazon unveiled.
It's Kindle Fire Tablet, which comes with a price tag of $199 at the event CEO Jeff Bezos. Also announced two new versions of the Kindle e-reader with price tags of $79 and $99. Seth Jason? Fire.
It's pretty amazing that they're going to sell what is essentially an Android tablet for $200. It lacks some of the bells and whistles, but they didn't really come out and say, here's our Android tablet. They were very clever. I thought in saying this is a Kindle, but it's a Kindle for more than just books.
It's a color Kindle for magazines, obviously books. It could be textbooks now. And then for video, another content which Amazon can now stream or send to you via rental or download. And I think that makes a lot of sense because they can't really compete on the hardware front with higher-end tablets.
What Amazon, I think, is hoping to do here is just sort of give you a gateway drug or the gateway razor so that they can sell you the blades. That's pretty obvious. I'm anxious to see if it works. This is still a big gamble though because at least according to the Wall Street Journal, they're losing money on every fire that they're making.
And I'm guessing the other one's now too with these price points. So they're really hoping to make it up in content volume. It might not come. It's really competitive.
There's no guarantee that people are all going to get Amazon from or whatever they're thinking. James? I like every article this morning that I thought sounded up really well. Amazon seems to be going after the Apple ecosystem like nobody else can.
The iPhone, the iPad, iTunes, and App Store. And now Amazon can kind of do that same thing with the fire and go into their music, they have streaming, they have cloud, and they can do that. Like kind of no one else who has invented a tablet before this has been able to do. And I find that very interesting.
And without specifically calling out Apple, you look at it not by name. But when you have Jeff Bezos saying things like we're building premium products and offering them at non-premium prices, that's clearly a jab at Apple and the price tag of the iPad. I think it is. And I think I don't think it's going to sway a lot of potential buyers from the iPad actually because I think people buy Apple products not just because they like the product, but because they like people seeing them with Apple products.
And so I think this is more a product aimed at people who really weren't considering the iPad so much in the first place. It's for the rest of us. This is an entertainment tablet in its current form. What we see down the road a year from now, I don't know.
To James' point, there is no guarantee that the Kindle Fire tablet is going to be a slam dunk. So what is something that investors should watch over the next six months to gauge to what degree this thing is a success? Is it Amazon Prime memberships? Is it declining sales of the iPad?
What do you think, Seth? I don't know that they give away enough metrics. They didn't break out Kindle sales, for instance, for a long, long time. So I'm not sure you'll get enough specifics during the calls to really understand.
So I would just watch that revenue line because that's the whole key. And it's hardware. It's all the stuff they sell. Watch that revenue line to make sure it keeps going up.
James? Yeah, I agree with Seth. They're going to try hard to obfuscate this unless it's some huge success. They're going to make it very murky.
So watch the revenue and watch what Apple's doing. You're listening to Motley Fool Money. We're here every week, but for daily analysis on the latest money news, you can check out our daily podcast Market Foolery. That's Market Foolery on iTunes and online at MarketFoolery.com.
Sticking with Amazon, earlier in the week Amazon struck a deal with Fox for more video content for their delivery. Netflix also announced a deal with DreamWorks Animation that starts, I believe, in 2013. Ron Gross, Amazon Netflix. Both Motley Fool recommended stocks.
Netflix, down again this week, it's hit a 52-week low. What do you think of the deal that they struck? As far as the stock, Netflix was obviously priced at perfection and they've stumbled recently. And so when that occurs, the stock trades lower.
They're both doing what they need to do is build their library up because the winner of this will most likely have the best content. But it's such an infancy, this industry, this streaming business, that we don't know if it's going to be either one of these guys or the cable companies, the satellite companies, even the content providers themselves. It's too early to say, but both companies are doing what they need to do by adding titles. I think this is kind of a yonder of a deal which may explain the lack of enthusiasm from the market this week based on this content deal.
We don't have a lot of details, so we don't know what it costs. The numbers being thrown around are 30 million per picture over an indetermined amount of time. But this isn't really a deal yet or it's not new content yet. It doesn't start until 2013 and it's based on new releases.
So they will get the Crude's Turbo, which is a movie about a garden snail, and then a spin-off from Rocky and Bullwinkle, Peabody and Sherman. In other words, the titles we associate with DreamWorks like Kung Fu Panda and Ants, according to the New York Times story, they broke this news, those will be available over time. So you're not even necessarily getting the stuff you think you're getting when you just hear DreamWorks, and I think that explains sort of the yawn and the continued decline of Netflix stuff. Who's not looking forward to a movie about a garden snail?
I think it seems big. Coming up, big banks doing what they do best. Coming up with new fees. You're listening.
Come out. They full money. Welcome back to Monty. Chris Hill here in the studio with Seth Jason James Early and Ron Gross.
Bank of America is planning to start charging a $5 monthly fee for debit card users. Several other banks, including Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase, are also planning similar fees. James, are we surprised by this? We are not.
Bank of America is the guy who looks like he's coming to help you. After you've got mugged and beaten up, but he's really just going to take your wallet. He's going to have to take our bailout money and now they're charging these fees. The difference between what they're doing and the other banks, Bank of America's fees are higher and they're going to be more universal.
It's more the pilot program, never-who else. This Dodd-Frank legislation, I think specifically this Dick Durbin Amendment is going to raise, actually, lower the fees that banks get for debit card transaction from an average of 44 cents to 24 cents according to the Wells Returnal. Bank of America says that's going to cost them $2 billion a year in fees. Actually, it's not because it's going to cost us those fees if we use these cards.
The best thing, I'm just going to take out cash. I don't like Bank of America. I have an account there. If you just take out the cash, you avoid this.
It doesn't apply to ATMs. The point is it's more just it's not the spirit of what they should be doing. They took all this money. They need to be engendering public goodwill.
Not this kind of stuff. Seth, you want to grab these guys and club them. Just a little bit. You just club them a little bit.
You just club them around. Orange is in a sack, maybe. This is horrible, but it shows you the unintended and easily predictable consequences of a lot of what we might call reform legislation. This is where we probably ought to grab our politicians and put them in for a little clubbing as well.
When you charge a business, a fee, the first thing they're going to do is turn around and look to pass it on to consumers. You're not actually taking any money out of the business's pockets. You are taking it out of everybody else's pockets. Just yesterday, my bank sent me a letter, Citibank, that they would be taking on $15 monthly fees unless you kept a relatively sizable balance in your accounts.
You're a big role to those. I just had that annoying. The first thing I thought was, you know what? I'm going to go to just one of these local community banks that are regional and are hungry for business and are more into the customer service.
I'm not sure that it could really backfire on a lot of these big money center banks. Let's do that. Let's put in a plug. Walk out on the main street in your area and go to one of the small banks there because the only way you're going to free yourself from the oligarchy of these giant banks is to go somewhere else.
This week Warren Buffett announced a stock repurchase plan for Berkshire Hathaway. It is the first time since he took over in the 60s. Why now? Well, it's because the stock has really never been cheaper.
At least before he made the announcement. It's pop sense. But we only had a million-dollar portfolio. But it personally investors really all over Wall Street have been saying Berkshire represents a really attractive opportunity right now.
Of course, Buffett is in a position to see that more than anyone. And he said he's interested in buying a back stock. As long as it doesn't get to be 10% higher than its book value. He'll pay up to 10% higher than the company's book value, which is actually where it is right now because of the pop.
But he's really just recognizing value the way the rest of the street has. Maybe I'm cynical, but am I the only one who's noticing that in some time in the future, I don't know how many years, but there's going to be something different in the picture of Berkshire. No more Warren Buffett. Obviously he's got these guys coming to take over.
There's no guarantee. They're going to manage the company as well as he has. I don't think you can extrapolate like the market is doing. It's just so cheap because things are going to be very different going forward too.
When you look at all of the holdings that Berkshire Hathaway has, obviously Buffett is making a comment on what he thinks about the valuation of his company stock. Do you think he's also indicating something about how he feels about the broader stock market? Absolutely. As he said in an interview this morning, he bought $4 billion worth of stock this quarter in companies that he obviously I don't know which companies that he finds attractive as a result of this sell-off.
And he's in the best position to see how Guy Goes Doi or how the railroads are doing or how much candies he's selling. But he obviously feels confident in those operating businesses as well. That's a pretty good insight because he owns big chunks of these businesses and he can therefore know things about other businesses that we may not quite get yet. Shares of Research and Motion hit a five-year low this week as the company denied rumors it is killing off its playbook tablet.
Of course it's not. The Amazon Kindle Fire is killing off of it. It actually is apparently the same tablet made by the same makers in almost the same hardware specs. Research and Motion, I think I've had a thumbs down in our Motley Fool caps system for quite a while.
I don't think they have a protected end market anymore. They're under attack by Apple, the smartphone business, by Android phones and by Windows phones. The tablet market, that playbook, may no impact at all. They don't have the ecosystem that Amazon has and they don't have the hardware style that Apple has.
I think Research and Motion is one of those companies that's doomed to dwindle away and then eventually become a value investor's favorite as its small core audience produces some cash for it. How much smaller do you have to share of rim? I would have to see that accelerated. I need them to be just kind of niche blackberry business into the institutional industry.
There's still some still die-hard blackberry guys out there. That would interest me. Of course they would have to be at the right price. The hits just keep on coming for Groupon.
The company restated its revenue to the SEC. Guys, only slightly. Turns out that in the first half of 2011, the revenue was $688 million. Not the previously stated $1.5 billion.
That's slightly too. That's a big old potato. What's the difference? Is this company ever going to make it to the IPO line or are they just doomed to the state private?
Cheesy moves like this don't help. Just to give you an analogy, if I'm collecting money from you, Chris, for both me and Ron, I just say, giving both of our money, I'll just give him his. Groupon was effectively doing that, but counting that all as its own revenue, now the money was going to give to its customers. Now it is being more honest and just counting its own revenue.
You ask why would they bother to do that if they're later going to take that expense later on down the income statement? The idea is that a lot of these companies at this stage are valued on a price to sales basis. They don't even look at the earnings because frankly they don't have earnings. An investor, an investment banker might mistakenly value them too high if they report a big sales number, which they were trying to do.
It's a little bit sneaky. A COO jumpship same week and I think a good move went over to Google to head their Americas business. Back to Google, Stella, I think I would do the same. I don't know that Groupon seems like a really well managed company because the COO leaves and then you've got a quote from the CEO of Groupon, Andrew Mason, saying, the chief operating officer is gone and this change won't have an impact on operations.
What will it have an impact on operations? Why were you paying this person all this money to be COO? This seems like a company that worked hard but got really lucky and probably needs to scramble to sort of sell out now. That said, I'm on record on the show of saying that when this IPO's I would buy a little bit of it just on the chance that they collect all the marbles in this game.
For those keeping sore at home, the company lost about $240 million for the first half of 2011. So if it does go public to answer your original question, I think it's going to be at a much more reasonable valuation than we were looking at three to six months ago. And finally guys, we have to pay tribute to Arch West, the creator of Doritos. He was buried in Dallas this week.
He was cremated, ashes in the urn lowered into the ground and then family and friends tossed Doritos chips into his grave as part of the tribute. It's a pretty amazing guy. We talked about this on our daily market full repotcast. He was going to come up with the idea for Doritos.
It struggled at first and now it's doing $5 billion. It's a $5 billion brand for Doritos. In other words, Doritos is a much bigger business than half of the small companies who talk about it every week. One thing you would like to talk into your grave when you're eventually buried?
Somebody else were crying out loud. Let's turn it a little bit. Let's do the whole pharaoh thing. Throw in a bunch of servants, maybe a few dried up cats and a chariot for the afterlife.
Wow, that's a big grave we're talking about. James, what about you? I'm a big conifer guy. So any type of branches from Pisces, Rubens, Avies, and these are all my favorite trees.
Wow, I've got a whole bunch of firewood that I can toss in with you, James. Ron, I'm going for a pepperoni pizza, but not just any pepperoni pizza. One from Da Vinci's Pizza in Rockland County, New York, the pizza place of my youth. Wow.
What are you going to do with the pizza if you're dead? Don't worry about it. It's a little bit. Ron Droz, James Early, Seth, Jason, guys.
We'll see you later in the show. As always, you can drop us an email at radio at fool.com. Coming up, best selling author Justin Fox on the myth of the rational market and what it means for investors. Stay right here.
This is my local money. Welcome back to Molly Fullman. I'm Chris Hill. So what does it mean when people say the stock market is rational?
Is there anything to the rational market theory? Answer those questions and more as Justin Fox, editorial director of the Harvard Business Review Group and author of the New York Times bestselling book, The Myth of the Rational Market, a History of Risk, Reward and Delusion on Wall Street. Justin, thanks for being here. Thanks so much for having me, Chris.
So what does it mean to say that the market is rational? Well, that brings back this really scary memory when I was just deep in writing this book and didn't know if I'd ever finished my cousin who is an anthropologist asked me, what do you mean by rational anyway? And I realized I had no idea. I think in terms of the term the rational market, which sort of had its moment in the 70s and 80s, this idea that financial markets are about the best possible measure of how companies are doing.
I mean, perfectly is probably too strong a word. I don't know that anyone ever believed that they were perfect. But the values on the stock market are the best possible estimate of what the companies out there, what the prospects of the economy are, et cetera. And I guess the problem with that is just, I mean, at some level it's this truism that who is any individual to know better than the assembled wisdom and guesswork of millions of investors.
But at the same time, it's pretty clear in retrospect that the market is more volatile than the economy is. It's jumping around a lot. And some of that is just because the future is always uncertain and there's going to be some guesswork. But I think it seems pretty obvious that there's just also this role that emotion and changing risk tolerance plays in the market's big move.
You're listening to Motley Fomang, talking with Justin Fox, author of The Myth of the Rational Market, a History of Risk, Reward and Delusion on Wall Street. Whenever the market dips suddenly, the phrase that the media seems to use all the time is market correction, which seems to imply that- It's supposed to be lower. Yeah, but it's supposed to be lower. We never hear the term market correction when the market spikes up suddenly.
Wouldn't that also make sense? Yeah, it would make perfect. I've never thought of that before. And I wonder when that term first became current.
It would be interesting to do an excess search or something to see when that started to be used. I mean, I first started hearing it a lot in the late 90s where I think it was a pretty good argument that Eddie dropped at the market. Well, it was a market correction. But, yeah, nowadays, either way, could be the correction.
Who knows? I love that. I don't know where that came from, but that's really funny. There's a definite negative bias to that term.
Alright, the book is The Myth of the Rational Market, A History of Risk, Reward and Delusion on Wall Street. You profile a bunch of people in the book. I want to talk about a few of them and sort of get your sense of takeaways for investors today. Let's start with Irving Fisher.
This is someone I had never heard of really sort of the first person to try and impose reason and science on the stock market. Back in the 1920s, but he also went on to say in the late 1920s that stocks had reached a permanently high plateau. That's a pretty staggeringly huge misfire, isn't it? Yeah, and even if it hadn't misfired, anybody who ever looked at a stock chart knows that markets don't really do plateaus.
It was a really weird way to put it. I think what it was, and it was just so fascinating to read his work from the 1890s in the first decade of the 20th century, where he's laying stuff out and doing it in a current rough version, not putting it all in. Well, in some cases he put it all into mathematical terms. Pretty much every idea of modern academic finance.
Irving Fisher laid out there around the turn of the 20th century. And he could see at that point, he said, this is my model of how the market works. In reality it doesn't work like that because people are like sheep and they do silly things. But I think what happened is things went so well for him personally in the 20s.
He invented this filing system. It's basically the precursor for the Rolodex, which I don't know may not mean anything anyone under, about 35, but it used to be how everybody kept track of addresses and phone numbers. And he sold that for a ton of money. All of his ideas seem to be being adopted.
He was one of the most vocal advocates of prohibition. That was prohibition all of a sudden. And I just get this, I mean I don't feel like I know him deeply, like logic. But you get this and you figure, okay, everybody followed my advice.
So I guess everything's fine now. And it made him look awfully stupid afterwards. But what was fascinating is even though he was completely humiliated in the public eye, within a couple of years his economic ideas were making this rapid comeback. And I mean one of them is simply what the Federal Reserve has been doing over the past couple of years in terms of basically printing money to try to keep the economy from collapsing more than it already has.
That's pure Irving Fisher. And in the early 30s nobody at the Fed wanted to listen to him this time around. They are. I don't know if it's the right decision.
But it seems to be working out a little bit better than the early 30s. And then as time went by a lot of his ideas about financial markets and the way to think about financial markets began to catch on. Another person you profile is Jack Bogol who founded Vanguard and is really the guy to popularize index funds. Yeah.
I mean Jack, anybody knows Jack. He's one of their favorite people. I loved working with him on this book. I mean one of the funniest things in the whole process of doing the book is I was sitting in the library at the business school at Columbia looking through back issues of the financial analyst journal.
And at some point in 1960 or 61 a couple of Chicago grad students wrote a piece. And I had never heard anyone, I'd never seen this referred to anywhere. They wrote a piece saying, you know, there are too many mutual funds out there. Some of these are just started, a fund that owns the Dow Jones average.
So it's not quite an index fund since Dow Jones isn't really an index. But same idea. And a couple of months later there's this rebuttal article by, and the byline says by John B. Armstrong.
And the bottom says this is a pseudonym for an executive at a mutual fund company. And I just thought about it for a minute. And there are a couple references that have seen from me. I emailed Bogol.
I was like, was that you Jack? And it was. So in early 60s Jack Bogol was writing articles in the financial analyst journal thing with a stupid idea index funds were. And 12 years later or so, he was founding the first one for retail investors.
And the story of how that came to be, I can't go into all of it here. And Bogol is wonderfully frank about it all. It's just a wonderful example of how life happens and it can change your attitude. I think Bogol never became a big believer in this idea of the rational or the efficient market.
He just thought that the incentives in the mutual fund industry to appear to have great performance for a couple of years. And therefore, they're a lot of funds. And also the charge high fees weren't in the interest of investors. And if you just sort of gave up on all that, even if the market weren't perfectly rational, you were still better off because you were taking less of the investors money away to start with.
Another person that you write about and rightfully so was Warren Buffett, who obviously has had amazing success. But really in a very different, taking sort of a different approach from John Bogol. I mean, I don't think they're contradictory. There are two different ways to do it.
What struck me is I thought and learned more about Buffett and his career is that there are two crucial elements. And everybody to why he's been successful. And everybody focuses on the first, which is that he's a really smart investor and has some sort of thoughts of how to do things that really work and is willing to speak to them. But the other really important one is the way he's designed his investment vehicle.
And basically he's designed it. So it doesn't matter if his investors lose faith in him. I mean, it probably does over periods of decades. But there can be periods like the late 90s when what he's doing is completely out of fashion.
And it has no impact on how much cash he has available to invest. Because he's not like a mutual fund or even hedge fund where he's taking his client's money and then investing it. He's set up this structure where the money he's investing is basically the cash flow from the company he owns and sales of his existing investment. So the lesson there is basically to be a truly successful value investor.
You kind of need to set up a structure where you don't have to respond to your ninnish customers all running away when there's an internet bubble or times are tough or whatever else. You're listening to Motley Follmani, talking with Justin Fox, author of The Myth of the Rational Market, a history of risk reward and delusion on Wall Street. How do you invest your own money? It's kind of funny given that this book is the story of the falling apart to a certain extent of this worldview of perfectly rational efficient markets.
And over the course of doing it, I moved more and more into just putting all my money at index funds. And it's not because I think every last person should do that. It's because one of the things I was doing, well, A, I was suddenly a lot busier than I've done before because I was trying to write a book and have a day job. And B, I was reading a lot about behavioral finance, behavioral economics and all the weird traits people have counterproductive in terms of managing money and recognizing every single one of those in myself.
And so I finally just said, you know, I'm just going to give up and sort of adopt a middle of the road, super low cost strategy and not think about it more than once every few months. And that's pretty much what I've done ever since. Alright, let's wrap up with a round of buy, shell or hold. Let's start with a new product that was unveiled this week.
Buy, sell or hold, Amazon's Fire tablet. I'd say buy. I mean, it's funny because I help run a book publishing operation. And a lot of people I work for have been spending a ton of time actually trying to find out more about it and figuring out how to work.
And they're all very excited. I'll be also very curious about how something can work out. But it seems like the two dominant tablets for the time being, the short term five years or so, are going to be the iPad and whatever the Amazon has. This is a private company that has had a bumpy road on the way to its IPO.
Buy, sell or hold, Groupon. I just think the thing that's exciting about social media companies is sort of the leverage inherent in their business model to get other people to do all the work. Groupon has to compare with any other social media company. It just has incredibly huge numbers of employees and incredibly high cost.
It may be an okay business, but I don't see it as being a great investment. And finally, he shares your name, but not your passion for economics. Buy, sell or hold, Justin Bieber. Hold.
I mean, he hasn't gone away yet. So I imagine he will have a long career. I don't know that it'll be a Justin Timberlake-ish career, which has been full of reinventions and such. But I don't think he's going away.
Do I detect in your voice that you wish he would go away? Well, it's a weird thing. On Twitter, every once in a while, I suddenly get a bunch of Justin Bieber followers. So they start asking, are you a singer?
And so I just got a couple of those the other days on MiraTay. But I don't want to listen to his music, but he seems as teen-Iols go, less jerky than most events. So I'll power to him. The book is the myth of the rational market, a history of risk, reward and delusion on Wall Street.
It is a New York Times bestseller. It is a great read. Justin Fox. Thanks so much for being here.
Thanks so much for having me on. Coming up, we'll give you an inside look at Stocks on a Radar. This is Motley Fool Money. It's fun to talk around the mountains.
As always, people in the program may have interested in stocks they talk about. And Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against. So don't buy or sell stocks, but they solely on what you hear. I'm Chris Hill.
I'm back in the studio with me, Seth Jason, James Early, and Ron Gross. Guys, before we get to Stocks on our radar, last week our producer, Matt Greer, did a great job filling in for me. And very nicely asked our listeners to email some sinus remedies because I was in frankly a great deal of pain. We got a lot of great emails, a lot of great legitimate health advice.
How much weird holistic stuff did we get? Not really a lot, but let me just read two emails. You tell me if this is weird, holistic, because these were my two favorite from Clara Gustas, her remedy for sinus infection. A little antihistamine and a lot of scotch.
You won't even know your teeth are aching. Nice. I'm not Claire. You know me so well.
And this one from Dave Hook. I recommend the Hungarian hat cure. You will need one hat, one bottle of whiskey and one shot glass. Hang the hat off a bed post, get into bed.
Continue taking shots of whiskey until you see two hats. At that point, you will probably no longer be feeling the effects of your sinus condition. We also talked previously, I think it was last week about Wendy's, and they're changing up their burger recommendations. We got some great burger recommendations from our listeners as well, because we were looking for, you know, not the national stuff.
We want the local insight, Ron. So I know you're going to love these. Eric Marshall recommends the Butter Burger at Culver's. The western chain that I've spoken about before.
Is there a butter like in the middle of it? No, they butter the bun. That's why Wendy's is copying here. But Culver's are great.
They're just awesome. Michael Ritter recommends the Pigalicious Burger at the Polkadot Pig Gastropob in Augusta, Georgia. You know, we have an affiliate down there. And so maybe a road trip is right here.
Yeah. I think it does mail if you up, right? Oh, sure. Absolutely.
And we got a couple of listeners from Southern California, Matthew Holbrook and Harvey Ivory, both recommending a place called Slater's 50-50. And the 50-50 stands for the fact that they make a burger that is 50% ground beef and 50% bacon. And 100% awesome. You're rethinking the pizza.
You want that now. All right. Time for the Stocks on our radar. Brought to you by Encore Insurance Services.
Do you have life insurance? But think you might be paying too much. You might want to check Encore could help for a free quote visit their website at smartterm.com or call toll-free 1-866-347-5748. Don't compare rates to help you save.
And the information's online at smartterm.com. All right. We will bring in our man Steve Rutter with a question for each one of you about your stock this week. Ron Gross, Europe first.
Okay. A company I own personally called Horsehead Holdings, ticker symbol Z and C. He's got it all ready to the Godfather. No, it does not.
It is their maker of specialty Zinc products, stocks of 60% on fears of a global slowdown. And Zinc prices, the commodity itself, are down significantly as well, which is leading to the downtrend in this stock. The company's currently trading for less than its tangible book value, which is an indication to me that this is quite cheap as long as you're patient and you're able to wait out the cycle. Steve, is Zinc as useful as I think it is?
Have you never seen the Simpsons call a pack? Perhaps have you heard of the US penny, not made of copper. Yeah. No, mostly is it industrial?
Yeah, it's almost all industrial. You like galvanized stuff, don't you? Zinc oxide with your neighborhood light, quite a lot. Herlov is from me too.
Alright, James, early your stock this week. Chris, I'm looking at national fuel gas. The ticker is in FG. It's a former income investor.
I'm glad I got out when I did, but they are sort of turning things around. It's basically a gas company, a natural gas company in the northeast based in New York. And almost 3.3% yield, excuse me. And it's nothing really sexy, but it's one of these solid companies that should do well if we continue moving towards our future of natural gas.
Steve, bro, no question for James? Sure. Where do you pretty corporate yields are going in the next 12 months? Well, that's not really about my stock, Steve.
But I'll answer it anyway. You're talking about bond? I think corporate stocks are decent now. I see them going up gradually because there's still a lot of cash companies have.
And there's a lot of sentiment for dividends. Investors want them. Seth, Jason, you're stock this week. I'm going to go to the Microsoft.
The Microsoft stock has sort of been going nowhere. The value investors have loved it forever. They're disappointed, but that's not because Microsoft is done poorly, but because people just aren't paying up a lot of money for Microsoft. They recently released what I think is a game changer for them, which is an update to Windows Phone 7.
And it's not so much that, okay, the phone OS is a lot cooler, therefore it's great. It's that it is much more rooted in getting people to stick with their cloud-based services, especially the office services. And that is now the biggest portion of revenue and profits. So I think that they're going to do better there.
And MSFT is the ticker. Steve, I heard a lot about Windows 8 coming out. I believe it's next year. What is your perspective on how it's going to do?
It's gotten pretty good reviews right now. I think if the hardware is good enough, it should work out well because they should be able to deliver a simplified tablet experience. But at the same time, you can sort of click a button and this thing will work more like a regular Windows PC and run actual programs that do work, which is something that all those other tablets out there do not do. Just in a few seconds we have left.
One thing you're working on next week in a million dollar portfolio run? Stock market weakness has created some opportunities. I think we're going to actually have some new trades next week. Stay tuned.
Okay, James, an incoming investment. Doing a lot of evaluation work as I move towards my next issue. Sexy, Seth, and him and James? Trying to keep up again, we trade with Real Money as it does run, but these two, three percent moves each way every day to make it very tough for us to get in and get out, but we're keeping at it.
All right, Jason, James, really run gross. Guys, thanks for being here. Thanks for our guest this week, Justin Fox. That's it for this edition of Motleyful Money.
Check out our daily podcast, Market Foolery. That's every day throughout the week at MarketFoolery.com and on iTunes. Our engineer is Steve Broido, our producer is Matt Greer. I'm Chris Hill.
Thanks for listening. We'll see you next week.