EPISODE · Oct 5, 2014 · 28 MIN
Mullan on Criminal Evidence
from Pod's law · host Julius Komorowski
The fifth show in our series is with Owen Mullan, Advocate, of Mackinnon Advocates. You can find out about him here:www.mullanadvocate.co.ukWe discuss the following case:= Beurskens v HM Advocate =Appeal Court, High Court of Justiciary26 February 2013[2014] HJAC 99Were signed statements taken by police officers on the instructions of the procurator fiscal "precognitions" and therefore inadmissable as evidence?Judgment: http://tinyurl.com/Beurskens-v-HMAOwen's blog: http://www.mullanadvocate.co.uk/beurskens-v-hma-precognition-or-statement/== About the series ==You can follow the show on twitter (@podslaw), where every new episode will be announced, and like the show on Facebook:www.facebook.com/podslawjkYou can also subscribe through iTunes:www.tinyurl.com/podslaw-iTunes
Embed this episode
NOW PLAYING
Mullan on Criminal Evidence
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.