EPISODE · Feb 8, 2024 · 4 MIN
Murray v. UBS Securities, LLC, et al. - Docket No. 22–660
from 9robes · host 9robes.ai
The Court held that a whistleblower who brings a claim under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act's anti-retaliation provision must prove that their protected activity was a contributing factor in the employer's unfavorable personnel action, but does not need to prove that the employer acted with "retaliatory intent" or animus. More at 9robes.ai
Embed this episode
NOW PLAYING
Murray v. UBS Securities, LLC, et al. - Docket No. 22–660
0:00
4:21
1×
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long is this episode of 9robes?
This episode is 4 minutes long.
When was this 9robes episode published?
This episode was published on February 8, 2024.
Can I download this 9robes episode?
Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!