EPISODE · Aug 7, 2021 · 1H 13M
Ne može nam niko ništa, jači smo od sudbine
from Infinitum · host Aleksandar Vacić, Milan Adamov
Ep 162GitFinderMan sends AirTag to Tim Cook and Apple returns it along with letter — MDNiOS 14.7.1 and macOS Big Sur 11.5.1 Patch Security Vulnerability That May Have Been Actively Exploited — MacRumorsBBEdit 14 Adds Simple Notes Management — TidBITSApple Q3 2021 Results - $81.4 Billion Revenue — MacStoriesApple Is Now an Antifragile Company - TidBITSRene Ritchie: New Magic Keyboard with Touch ID, Magic Trackpad, and Magic Mouse that debuted with the M1 iMac are now available for individual purchase (in silver and white) from Apple. (Touch ID on the new keyboards only works with M1 Macs, including the M1 Mac mini)Apple Introduces New High-End Graphics Options for Mac Pro — MacRumorsApple: Child SafetyApple's search for child abuse imagery raises serious privacy questions - Malwarebytes LabsPrivacy, Schmivacy. Apple installs backdoors to iPhones — MDNOpen letter asks Apple not to implement Child Safety measures — AppleInsiderApple’s New ‘Child Safety’ Initiatives, and the Slippery Slope — Daring FireballMatthew Green:Regardless of what Apple’s long term plans are, they’ve sent a very clear signal. In their (very influential) opinion, it is safe to build systems that scan users’ phones for prohibited content.That’s the message they’re sending to governments, competing services, China, you.EvaEva:Louder, for the people in the back: it’s impossible to build a client-side scanning system that can only be used for sexually explicit images sent or received by children.Drew McCormack:The reason Apple’s approach is going far too far comes down to one thing: the difference between law enforcement, where an agency needs good reason to access private data, and surveillance. Apple’s approach is surveillance. (And from the company that made the 1984 ad.)Julian Sanchez:I’m curious how far they’ve thought out the legal end of this. A government (ours or an uglier one) approaches Apple with a court order saying “here’s a list of hash values we want you to add to the scan list you’re pushing out”. Can they refuse? Or even tell anyone?Julian Sanchez:And a whole bunch of the arguments Apple deployed in the San Bernardino encryption case don’t obviously apply if they’ve already built the scan architecture & a government is just adding items to a preexisting list.Perry E. Metzger:I cannot imagine owning a phone that might decide on its own to send copies of all my photographs to the government for analysis if some piece of software I’m forced to run decides the photos are bad, but that’s precisely what is apparently being deployed.Apple Addresses CSAM Detection Concerns, Will Consider Expanding System on Per-Country Basis — MacRumorsTidBITS FAQ about Apple’s Expanded Protections for ChildrenZahvalniceSnimljeno 7.8.2021.Uvodna muzika by Vladimir Tošić, stari sajt je ovde.Logotip by Aleksandra IlićArtwork episode50 x 40 cmulje/oil on canvas2021.by Saša Montiljo, njegov kutak na Devianartu.
What this episode covers
Da li je Apple pljunuo na svoju dosadašnju politiku privatnosti? Da li ih je neko jako pritisnuo ili je stvar potekla iznutra? Pre toga malo vesti.
NOW PLAYING
Ne može nam niko ništa, jači smo od sudbine
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
Oct 2, 2024 ·41m
Jul 8, 2024 ·58m
Jul 8, 2024 ·11m
Jul 8, 2024 ·32m
Jul 8, 2024 ·3m
Jul 8, 2024 ·13m