*NEWSFLASH*: Blackhorse Investments (Borough) Limited v The London Borough of Southwark

In this Newsflash episode, Lizzie Collin sits down with Richard Snape, Davitt Jones Bould's Head of Legal Training, to discuss Blackhorse Investments (Borough) Limited v The London Borough of Southwark. Richard analyses discharging restrictive covenants preventing development including leasehold land. This case holds relevance for stakeholders involved in developments of any size. Richard assesses the background to the case, reminding us of the importance of s84 of the LPA 1925. He further explains the reasoning behind the decision, giving context for future cases.   Cases mentioned:  Kay & Cunningham (2023) Re Cammiade (application under section 84 of the Law Property Act 1925) (2023)  Re Hickman & Sons Ltd’s Application (1951) Re Barclays Bank plc’s Application (1990) Blyth Corporation's Application (1962) Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd v Argyll Stores (Holdings) Ltd (1997) Westminster City Council v Duke of Westminster (1991) #RealEstate #Covenants #RestrictiveCovenants #DavittJonesBouldGet in touch! Training & Free Webinars for Property Professionals:Would you like to keep up to date with the latest in real estate law? Davitt Jones Bould offers legal training tailored to your organisation’s needs, delivered in person across the UK or remotely. We also run free monthly webinars through for surveyors, solicitors, and property professionals across sectors. To sign up or learn more, visit our events page here or email [email protected] for information and booking.  This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not intended to provide legal or professional advice. No liability is accepted by Davitt Jones Bould for any reliance placed on its content. Get in touch!