Nimbus,Masturbation,and Impossibility of Knowledge in Secular Philosophy

Join Dave, special guest Paul and I for a varied discussion involving a multitude of unheard of topics. The reason I demonstrated to Paul the problem of induction is because; since it never guarantees or necessitates the conclusion and leaves the possibility for infinite variation (in reasons for the conclusion); therefore one cannot know anything with certainty inductively because there could be something outside of what one thinks they know, that could contradict what they think they know (in those infinite possibilities); and thus the only way one could know anything at all with certainty is to ether be omniscient themselves, or get revelation from someone who is omniscient; and one cannot know anything with certainty inductively. The problem as I pointed out with deduction as well is deduction only deduces from axioms and verifies coherency; so unless one starts with self-justifying first premises or axioms the argument reduces to an infinite regress (and thus the arbitrary and impossibility of knowledge as well) of how you know your first premises or axioms are true or justified. Thus the only way one can have a justified epistemology that makes knowledge possible is by way of valid deduction from axioms that were revealed to you by an omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent mind (God) in order to justify and account for your axioms being true at all times (past, present and future) and anywhere.