OA430: Amy Coney Barrett Is Terrible episode artwork

EPISODE · Oct 16, 2020 · 1H 17M

OA430: Amy Coney Barrett Is Terrible

from Opening Arguments

Andrew watched the hearings so you don't have to! What is super-precedent? And did ACB really rule that an employer using the n-word wasn't hostile or racist? We've got the full breakdown! Before that, we have an excellent listener question on potential federal laws on things like Roe V Wade after the Handmaid's Tale Court takes away reproductive rights Links: McGahn petition, Article 1 sec 8, OA309 Stormy Daniels, CA v Texas, gov't opposition, Sinclair George Mason Law Review Article, Richmond Medical Center v. Gilmore, Smith v Illinois Dep't of Transportation, ACB questionnaire, 42 US Code § 2000e–2 - Unlawful employment practices.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Oct 16, 2020

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

OA430: Amy Coney Barrett Is Terrible

0:00 1:17:57

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Opening Arguments?

This episode is 1 hour and 17 minutes long.

When was this Opening Arguments episode published?

This episode was published on October 16, 2020.

Can I download this Opening Arguments episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!