Skip to content
OA486: Apportionment Might NOT Be Final episode artwork

Apr 30, 2021 1 hr 10 min

OA486: Apportionment Might NOT Be Final

from Opening Arguments

You all probably heard by now that NY lost a House seat by 89 people... But did they? Andrew argues that this has been misreported. Find out why! Along the way, find out way more than you ever wanted to about the math and Al Gore Rhythms behind apportionment! Also, Rudy Giuliani had some things taken in what shouldn't be called a "raid." Couldn't' have happened to a nicer obvious criminal! Then we answer some feedback on the previous episode, OA485: What If Your Client Tells You They’re Guilty? Links: OA307: Apportionment - The Census Fight Is Not Over, NPR 2020 Census Results, 13 US Code § 141 - Population and other census information, Executive Order on the Census, 2020 Census Apportionment Results, 2 U.S. Code § 2b, Method of Equal Proportions, Reapportionment Under the 1950 Census, "Computing Apportionment," US Census Bureau, Model Rule 3.3: Candor Toward the Tribunal

Episode details come from the podcast's RSS feed.

Embed this episode

Ready to play

OA486: Apportionment Might NOT Be Final

0:00 1:10:07

No transcript yet.

Requests help us decide what to transcribe next.

Frequently asked questions

How long is this episode of Opening Arguments?

This episode is 1 hour and 10 minutes long.

When was this Opening Arguments episode published?

This episode was published on April 30, 2021.

Can I download this Opening Arguments episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.