OA573: Harvard Law Review Publishes Dubious Note on Election Law episode artwork

EPISODE · Mar 1, 2022 · 1H 12M

OA573: Harvard Law Review Publishes Dubious Note on Election Law

from Opening Arguments

A note in the Harvard Law Review suggests we ought to "Remove presidential elections from the Anderson-Burdick Framework." So, just what does that mean and is it a good idea? Listen in as Andrew breaks it down! Also, we've got an update in the Madison Cawthorn situation, and more Kraken sanctions updates! Links: remedial election plan ruling, Special Masters plan, another kraken loss, Judge Parker ruling, 6th Circuit appeal, Removing Presidential Elections from the Anderson-Burdick Framework - Harvard Law Review

NOW PLAYING

OA573: Harvard Law Review Publishes Dubious Note on Election Law

0:00 1:12:17

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Opening Arguments?

This episode is 1 hour and 12 minutes long.

When was this Opening Arguments episode published?

This episode was published on March 1, 2022.

What is this episode about?

A note in the Harvard Law Review suggests we ought to "Remove presidential elections from the Anderson-Burdick Framework." So, just what does that mean and is it a good idea? Listen in as Andrew breaks it down! Also, we've got an update in the...

Can I download this Opening Arguments episode?

Yes, you can download this episode by clicking the download button on the episode player, or subscribe to the podcast in your preferred podcast app for automatic downloads.
URL copied to clipboard!