OA573: Harvard Law Review Publishes Dubious Note on Election Law episode artwork

EPISODE · Mar 1, 2022 · 1H 12M

OA573: Harvard Law Review Publishes Dubious Note on Election Law

from Opening Arguments

A note in the Harvard Law Review suggests we ought to "Remove presidential elections from the Anderson-Burdick Framework." So, just what does that mean and is it a good idea? Listen in as Andrew breaks it down! Also, we've got an update in the Madison Cawthorn situation, and more Kraken sanctions updates! Links: remedial election plan ruling, Special Masters plan, another kraken loss, Judge Parker ruling, 6th Circuit appeal, Removing Presidential Elections from the Anderson-Burdick Framework - Harvard Law Review

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Mar 1, 2022

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

OA573: Harvard Law Review Publishes Dubious Note on Election Law

0:00 1:12:17

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Opening Arguments?

This episode is 1 hour and 12 minutes long.

When was this Opening Arguments episode published?

This episode was published on March 1, 2022.

Can I download this Opening Arguments episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!