Ok, but Would AI Judges Really Be Any Worse? episode artwork

EPISODE · Dec 23, 2024 · 50 MIN

Ok, but Would AI Judges Really Be Any Worse?

from Opening Arguments

OA1103 - Is human intelligence necessarily more rational and just than artificial intelligence? How involved should AI be in our law and government? Professor Aziz Huq of the University of Chicago School of Law joins for a fascinating conversation about everything from the “right to a human decision” to the dystopian terrors of Tinder. “A Right to a Human Decision,” Aziz Huq, Virginia Law Review (2020) “The Geopolitics of Digital Regulation,” Aziz Huq (2024) “Chinese scientists develop AI ‘prosecutor' that can press its own charges,” Steven Chen, South China  Morning Post (2021) Check out the OA Linktree for all the places to go and things to do! If you’d like to support the show (and lose the ads!), please pledge at patreon.com/law!

NOW PLAYING

Ok, but Would AI Judges Really Be Any Worse?

0:00 50:39

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Opening Arguments?

This episode is 50 minutes long.

When was this Opening Arguments episode published?

This episode was published on December 23, 2024.

What is this episode about?

OA1103 - Is human intelligence necessarily more rational and just than artificial intelligence? How involved should AI be in our law and government? Professor Aziz Huq of the University of Chicago School of Law joins for a fascinating conversation...

Can I download this Opening Arguments episode?

Yes, you can download this episode by clicking the download button on the episode player, or subscribe to the podcast in your preferred podcast app for automatic downloads.
URL copied to clipboard!