Older and More Aggressive?

NOTE: This episode was accidentally uploaded as yesterday's podcast. To make the information match, the correct podcast for 6/16 has been uploaded in yesterday's place. If you heard this episode yesterday, please check out the newest episode in the June 16th podcast preceding this one. Sorry for the error.Don and Tom take on the latest attempt to reinvent retirement investing: the claim that retirees should hold 90% stocks and just 10% bonds. They explain why focusing on recent stock returns ignores both history and human behavior, discuss the role bonds play in managing risk and retirement income, and remind listeners that successful investing is about meeting your goals—not maximizing returns at any cost. They also answer a listener question about claiming Social Security early versus waiting until age 70 and revisit the importance of maintaining exposure to emerging markets despite their volatility.0:12 The newest retirement “better mousetrap”: 90% stocks, 10% bonds1:48 Bob Pozen’s argument for aggressive retirement portfolios3:01 Why 10-year return data can be misleading4:16 The psychology of large portfolio losses5:42 Bonds are not stocks: understanding the difference7:37 How fixed income supports retirement withdrawals8:22 Why retirees should know their actual asset allocation10:04 Taking only the risk you need to take12:25 Remembering how investors felt in 2000, 2008, and 202213:33 Using the Talking Real Money risk quiz14:27 Summer request for listener questions15:31 Listener Scott asks about claiming Social Security early17:07 Why delaying Social Security can still make sense18:32 The value of Social Security’s guaranteed increase20:11 Risks of assuming stock market returns will cooperate21:55 Why contrarian retirement advice attracts attention22:25 The overlooked role of emerging markets23:50 Why emerging markets belong in diversified portfolios24:30 The risks and rewards of global diversificationQuestions? Comments? Click!