On Being Reformed - Debates Over a Theological Identity episode artwork

EPISODE · Apr 27, 2019 · 47 MIN

On Being Reformed - Debates Over a Theological Identity

from Faith and Honor · host faithandhonor

An important recent book On Being Reformed: Debates over a Theological Identity has engaged prominent theologians on the question of the Reformed theological identity, and whether it is possible (any more) to formulate a coherent identity behind the term. Thinkers like Darryl G. Hart and R. Scott Clark have sought to recapture the term Reformed, using documents such as the Westminster Confession of Faith. On the other side, thinkers like Chris Caughey have argued that long and detailed confessions like the WCF are problematic, with articles that no one today (even Hart and Clark) would subscribe to. We bring Chris on the show to talk about this at some depth: does the term Reformed have a meaning, and who gets to decide? Did it ever have a stable meaning? Are Reformed Baptists a part of it? Was the Reformed pastor Jacob Arminius a part of it? What about John Calvin, who didn't unambiguously teach double predestination?We conclude with the historic lessons from the Nicene Creed, and a discussion on whether confessions ought to be minimalist or exhaustive.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Apr 27, 2019

Embed this episode

Ready to play

On Being Reformed - Debates Over a Theological Identity

0:00 47:01

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Faith and Honor?

This episode is 47 minutes long.

When was this Faith and Honor episode published?

This episode was published on April 27, 2019.

Can I download this Faith and Honor episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!