Opinion: Evaluating Judges & holding them to account is risky: We must answer the 'Why?' first episode artwork

EPISODE · Dec 4, 2025 · 7 MIN

Opinion: Evaluating Judges & holding them to account is risky: We must answer the 'Why?' first

from ThePrint · host ThePrint

The citizen waiting years for a verdict, the undertrial languishing in jail, the firm losing money with every delay and adjournment – they are the point. Processes for the improvement of institutions must be designed with the litigant in mind. Siddarth Raman, co-founder and CTO of The Professeer, explains why, before attempting to impose populist measures to "evaluate" judges, we must think deeply about the "why" behind such evaluation exercises. Without this basic hygiene, he warns, we risk diluting independence in the system.----more----Read article here: https://theprint.in/opinion/judges-account-collective-conscience-fix-broken-system/2795463/

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Dec 4, 2025

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Opinion: Evaluating Judges & holding them to account is risky: We must answer the 'Why?' first

0:00 7:38

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of ThePrint?

This episode is 7 minutes long.

When was this ThePrint episode published?

This episode was published on December 4, 2025.

Can I download this ThePrint episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!