Originalism v. Common Law episode artwork

EPISODE · May 7, 2024 · 1H 17M

Originalism v. Common Law

from Advisory Opinions · host The Dispatch

Judge Edmund Sargus from the Southern District of Ohio joins Sarah and David to take on originalism and different means of constitutional interpretation. The Agenda: —Brown v. Board of Education and the different judicial philosophies that can be applied to the case —Originalism vs. common law traditionalism —Challenges and limitations of textualism and originalism —Landmark cases and the Supreme Court’s decisions shaping societal progress —Interpreting ambiguous constitutional terms like ‘equal protection’ and ‘due process’ —Thus ends DEI Show Notes: —Plessy v. Ferguson —Rutan v. Republican Party —Bostock v. Clayton County —Loving v. Virginia —A blast from the past: Rep. James A. Traficant found guilty of corruption —David for the NYT: The Magic Constitutionalism of Donald Trump —Seceding from Secession: The Civil War, Politics, and the Creation of West Virginia —Fifth Circuit opinion from Judge Andrew Oldham Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published May 7, 2024

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Originalism v. Common Law

0:00 1:17:11

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Advisory Opinions?

This episode is 1 hour and 17 minutes long.

When was this Advisory Opinions episode published?

This episode was published on May 7, 2024.

Can I download this Advisory Opinions episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!