‘Outlaw King’ Is Netflix’s Foray Into Prestige. Did It Work? | The Oscars Show (Ep. 97) episode artwork

EPISODE · Nov 13, 2018 · 49 MIN

‘Outlaw King’ Is Netflix’s Foray Into Prestige. Did It Work? | The Oscars Show (Ep. 97)

from The Big Picture · host The Ringer

Dissecting ‘Outlaw King’ and what it means for Netflix’s upcoming releases of ‘The Ballad of Buster Scruggs’ and ‘Roma’ (1:20), stock up/stock down with ‘The Front Runner’ (23:15), and the emerging favorites for the Best Supporting Actress category (36:45). Now Netflix Wants to Conquer Prestige Movies—and the Oscars. Why? Sean Fennessey Hosts: Sean Fennessey and Amanda Dobbins Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Nov 13, 2018

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

‘Outlaw King’ Is Netflix’s Foray Into Prestige. Did It Work? | The Oscars Show (Ep. 97)

0:00 49:26
of MATCHES

TRANSCRIPT · AUTO-GENERATED

What's up guys, it's Liz Kelly. We're launching a new podcast with our very own staff artist Jay Serrano called Villains. It's an eight-episode series that dissects iconic movie villains like Hannibal Lecter from Silence of the Lambs, Regina George from Mean Girls, and Killmonger from Black Panther. The first episode comes out on Thursday, November 15th, but you can check out the trailer and subscribe right now on Apple, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts.

I'm Sean Fentasy. I'm Amanda Dobbins. And this is The Big Picture, a conversation show about the Oscars. Amanda, we're back.

This is episode two of The Big Picture's Oscar show, and what are we going to talk about this week? We're going to talk about big ideas with Netflix, big ideas with Widows, big ideas with the frontrunner. But let's start with Netflix with The Big Picture's Big Picture. The reason we're talking about this is because Netflix is trying to get into the prestige movie game.

Where are they? And it's been a couple of years since they've been making original movies. People may remember Beasts of the Donation a few years back with Idris Elba. You know, they may remember some wins in the documentary categories over the years.

But this year really marks in the aftermath of some of their rom-com success, which maybe we can talk about a little bit. Big time, best picture, aspirations. One of their first efforts debuted on Friday. It's a film called Outlaw King.

It's directed by David McKenzie. It stars one of our personal favorites, Chris Pine. It's the story of Robert the Bruce, one of the men who attempted to and ultimately did free Scotland from England's rule. Amanda, do you think Outlaw King is a worthy prestige movie?

No. And I think that's part of the problem here, is that I think it's a pretty worthy zone out and watch a movie. I think it's a worthy... It's Friday night and I want to watch some people fight on a battlefield.

I miss Game of Thrones. I just generally like medieval stuff. That's great. I think it's perfectly acceptable in that range.

And I think probably plenty of people watched it that weekend and kind of took that away. Like, hey, great. Okay. I watched a bunch of fight scenes.

Dope. I do not think that it will win at any awards. And it's been interesting that it was positioned as a prestige movie. Yeah, it was debuted at the Toronto International Film Festival in September.

It's funny that you mentioned Game of Thrones. I produced for Bobby right before he started. This just felt like an extended Game of Thrones episode to me. Kind of minus the dragons, I suppose.

You know, there is some lineage and I can see some of the rationale in their thinking when they started production on the film because it literally picks up where Braveheart leaves off. I mean, it is the story from William Wallace to Robert the Bruce and that connectivity in that time. And it kind of like looks and smells like a movie that would be nominated at the Oscars in 1997, but not one that would be nominated in 2018. Yes, it's beautifully shot.

I mean, all of the vistas of Scotland looks great. It's a great travel advertisement. How about that catapult? Yeah.

And it has the big step pieces. It has Chris Pine is playing. He's doing a resigned great man version of this character, which is, you know, always an Oscar favorite. And obviously, also, David McKenzie has some Oscar history himself.

He directed Hell or High Water, which was nominated. It was screenplay years ago, yeah. So I get it. And also, I can see why they positioned it as a prestige movie because so much of this is like you kind of hope people will receive it as the way that you advertise it.

And sometimes prestige movies are good and sometimes they're really bad. And it is kind of, I guess, the cost of doing business in this game. They're trying to put themselves up for Oscars and sometimes you win and sometimes you lose. But I don't really think this is a win.

It's tricky when something is meh. That's something that Netflix always has to fight about because it's sort of always there. The lack of theater experience means that the, you know, the leverage, the sort of stakes of experiencing the movie are pretty low. It encourages a lot of second screen watching, which is not great for the immersive quality of movies.

We'll come back to that. You know, a few weeks ago, we saw 22 July, which is Paul Greengrass' story about the terrorist attacks in Norway. And that is quite a long and intense recreation of this very tragic event. And that too, you know, Greengrass has a lot of history of the Oscars.

He's made very serious, well-received films. 1993, the Bourne films, most recently Captain Phillips. That movie was not very warmly received as well. You know, it's in stark contrast, I think, to the way that the company was able to shift the narrative over the summer.

With a couple of movies like Set It Up, It's All the Boys I've Loved Before, Bill Simmons' Family, Huge fans of The Kissing Booth. There were all these sort of like teen and rom-com movies that people got really, you know, invested in. You worked on a story with Alyssa Baresnack about the way that social media grew around those folks. So we know that they can do some of the things that Hollywood has prided itself on over the years, which sort of build and mint new stars and then position them and then sign them up to contracts.

I think Zoe Dijk is doing another Netflix movie. I think Glenn Powell is doing another Netflix movie. So they're able to do those things. Getting to the Oscar is a little bit harder.

This week, they are releasing The Ballad of Buster Scruggs, which is a film by another Oscar-winning team, The Coen Brothers. It's a very interesting movie. It may or may not have started as a TV anthology series and then eventually was winnowed down to six mini films that are stitched together. There's been a little bit of disinformation about that because now that people are saying, well, this was never going to be a TV series or this was never meant to be.

You know, I don't know how seriously to take that. But The Coen Brothers, you know, No Country for Old Men is the best picture winner. They're routinely nominated at the Oscars. This movie too, while I'm a big fan of it, there's something ambient in the like, huh, okay, I guess this is like a big deal that I have to take seriously.

Do you sense what I'm saying? Yeah, and it's a Coen Brothers Western movie released during Oscar season. So there's also history there. And I think it's really interesting that it's not being taken as seriously as No Country for Old Men or True Grit, just because that pedigree signals, you know, traditionally in award season, it's like, okay, Box is Jack, Coen Brothers, yes, Western, yes, like, character actors who we would like to see get a shot.

Yeah, I mean, not to substitute you entirely, but, you know, this really is kind of a total prestige Oscar-bait movie. And it's not really getting that buzz. And that was so interesting to me, because we talked about this, it's an anthology movie. And that might be part of the reason it's not getting as much traction, because it has kind of like TV-esque elements.

At the same time, it seems like it's definitely more suited to the Netflix experience itself, which is, I wanted to bring up, because I watched Outlaw King at 10 a.m. yesterday, and I'd like to talk more about my viewing experience watching Outlaw King, but one of the things I thought was, I have no idea why this is a miniseries. Just make it a miniseries. It's on Netflix.

People like watching battles. Like, we have Game of Thrones. There's evidence for that. And, you know, when Outlaw King debuted at Toronto, it was 23 minutes longer, I believe.

That's right. And it was not received well. And so much has been made of the fact that the director got the chance to make a tighter edit. It's much better, blah, blah, blah.

I don't know what it is because it was not at Toronto. Nor was I. I thought it was notable that the scenes that were cut, according to an interview on Anywire, was an entire battle scene. Some sort of, like, long chase scene.

All of the action elements that I believe are the appeal of this movie. So, you know, I get he's a... Well, I think that we have to acknowledge that one of the other appeals is the revealing nature of Chris Pine's performance, I would say, also. Sure.

Though, again, give that more time. It's very short. I almost missed it. Do you think that that was maybe the entire 23 minutes that they just chopped out?

Just full frontal pine? Great. I think that would certainly give... That would definitely be more Game of Thrones-y.

And, listen, I don't want to be the person that's like, hey, every piece of entertainment should just be Game of Thrones because that works. That's very boring. But on Netflix, you have this space. I think in a lot of ways, this would have made more sense in its environment if it's just a bunch of fight scenes and people can do what they do on Netflix.

And it's kind of weird that it's so chunky. It's a very good point. And you're right about Buster Scruggs, too, because it's these six different films that are kind of stitched together. And if you...

You know, presentationally, it's as if you had opened a book about the Old West, and that's how they jump from story to story. But if you wanted to just watch, too, and pause it, and go make some pesto, come back, enjoy some pesto on a lovely oat loaf. I don't know. What are you pesto on?

Pesto. And then come back and turn on the next four. You can do that. And it's an enjoyable thing.

That movie is actually, I think, longer than Outlaw King. I think it's two hours and 20 minutes. But because of that sort of segmentized nature, you know, it just feels different. It's oddly breezy.

It's also just the Coen Brothers, and it's funny, and it's, you know, sad and sincere in some ways, but also really arch in other ways. But I don't know what the goal of that is other than just pure engagement. And that kind of raises a bigger picture question, which is like, why are they doing all these movies? And I don't totally know if I have the answer.

Do you have the answer? No, I don't. But I want to reiterate what you just said. It's the paradox of, are they making the movies to enjoy and to watch on Netflix?

It sounds like Buster Scruggs. It makes more sense. Yes. And also like True Grit and No Country, Pearl, Men are big hits.

You know, the pedigree of the Coen Brothers doing a Western, we know that you're going to get something that ostensibly people actually really like. Unlike, say, a much smaller Coen Brothers movie, like The Man Wasn't There or something like that. This is them in their, not just artistic, but commercial sweet spots. I get that.

These other movies, I don't know. I don't know what they're for. May I tell you a story about my viewing experience? Please do.

So I watched this movie at 10 a.m. on Sunday because, as has been mentioned already on this podcast, and as will become a running theme, I suspect, I am terrible at watching movies at home. I have no attention span. I love going to the theater.

I can focus. You take away my phone. You take away all the distractions. And I'm there in the experience.

Like, cinema. Wow, powerful. You put me on the couch. And then suddenly I've got my phone.

Suddenly someone's in the kitchen. Like, I think about pesto, as you just mentioned. And that was great. So I was already nervous about Outlocking.

I sat down at 10 a.m. I was like, I'm going to do this. I'm going to be a journalist. I'm going to watch this movie for this podcast.

And I did. Some other things I did while watching Outlocking were edit a piece. It's fine. It turned out well.

Meal plan for the week. And most telling me, I had about a 20-minute text conversation with a friend of mine who finally watched To All the Boys I've Loved Before this weekend. She's a mother of two young children. So, you know, she's catching up, catch a break.

But I just got an all-cast text message that was, oh, my God, have you seen To All the Boys I've Loved Before? And I said, yes, I have. Isn't it wonderful? And then she wanted to go on a 20-minute, you know, all of the Peter Kavinsky feelings and Lana Condor and talking about all of it.

And I was having this conversation about the power of one type of Netflix movie while watching another. And one that was extremely successful and accomplished, I think, its goals. And one that maybe isn't doing that quite so well because of exactly what you were doing, which is completely distracted by everything else around you. Yes.

And it's an interesting segue, I think, to talking about the news that happened around Netflix last week, which is that they decided, I guess, ultimately, philosophically to break rank with what they had been doing in the past. They decided to put movies in theaters. Now, there are a lot of caveats to this. The three movies that they decided to put in theaters are Roma, The Ballad of Buster Scruggs, and Outlaw King.

Outlaw King was in one theater in Los Angeles in the Valley this weekend. Did you see it? You didn't see it in the theater? No, I decided to speak to it.

I decided to do journalism and do it at home. So that's what I did. I don't think that's what journalism is. I'll give you a pass.

Similarly, Buster Scruggs, I think, is opening two theaters in New York this Friday. Roma, on the other hand, and this is sort of the reason for this conversation, ultimately, is opening on screens in three major cities, New York, Los Angeles, and Mexico City, which is where the phone takes place. And it's an interesting choice by Netflix because obviously, I suspect Alfonso Cuaron, the director, and his team encouraged Netflix quite vociferously to put this movie in theaters. You and I, as we said last week on the show, saw this movie in theaters where it is most definitely best watched.

It's very powerful. It will be great for Academy voters, but also for just people who are interested in seeing movies at a grand scale. Some of this feels like just kind of a gentle nod to the decency of the theater-going experience as opposed to some sort of massive shift. Maybe I'm wrong.

I think we can look forward to 2019. Martin Scorsese has a movie called The Irishman coming out. Michael Bay has a movie coming out through Netflix next year. You know, those are filmmakers who are used to the theatrical experience.

Roma is unique in that it actually is quite an intimate film, even though it has some sort of sweeping incredible shots, traditional wonders from Cuaron. I think if you have a nice-sized television in your home, and you're able to put your meal planning aside, and you're able to put your editing aside, you could have a great experience with this movie, particularly because, as we said, it's subtitled. It's in Spanish, and so you have to watch the film to watch the film. What do you think about their decision to go into some theaters?

Well, I support it. I have a couple different thoughts here. I think what you said about Roma requiring a bit more attention, but also being a type of film that actually will draw that type of attention is correct. I'm a terrible movie watcher, and I don't think that everyone is as slapper-ish as me, and I think also the people who seek out Roma will want to watch it and will be able to put things aside.

I think there are more mature people in the world than I am, for all the people who aren't. And I think the subtitles is kind of, it is also already getting such critical acclaim that I think people will be like, oh, Roma, now it's time for me to put everything away and and make it like an event. Yeah, there's something super generous about this. Yeah, as much as an event can happen in your living room.

I also, I think it's great that they're doing the theaters, both because I think that that's the best place to watch it, just because it was a really magical experience. I think we both had that, seeing it in theaters. Also, there's a lot of business stuff that we should unpack here, but in the concept of, does a theater run affect Netflix's ability to exist in the movie industry? Conceptually, no, not at all.

I think it's there for the people who seek it out, and then it's on Netflix for all the people who can't make it to a theater. It's a little like, I mean, this is a really facile comparison, but it's like concerts and Spotify. You can go to the concert if you're able, and that's important to you, and it's a wonderful, special experience, but the album is there for everyone who actually wants to use it. Anytime they want.

Yes. And that's the other thing about the point you made about All the Boys I've Loved Before. Your friend can just kind of sit out the first three or four months of dialogue around that movie, and then just go to it whenever he or she wants to, and just kind of have that experience, and maybe compel you, you know, lure you back into the communal aspect of watching movies by just texting you all morning. And also for all content producers, then she started Googling everything, and she found all your articles and podcasts, and she sent them, so, you know, you can sleep a little easier tonight.

So, you know, I think conceptually, I hope they do more theater runs. I think it's great. I think it opens up opportunities for people who can take them. The business that we gotta talk about, because that's the real.

There's an interesting side effect of some of this news that broke this week, which is Roma attempted to buy out a series of theaters at the Alamo Draft House, which is this theater chain spread across the country, in many urban centers, but, you know, in Texas, and New York, and Los Angeles, and all around. And they wanted it to be a one-month-long run, from a time in November all the way through a time in December. And, of course, Alamo Draft House was ultimately disinterested in this, because halfway through that one-month forewalling, as they call it, the movie would be on Netflix. So, if the movie opens on December 14th on Netflix, on December 17th, why would you go to a movie theater to see it?

Unless you are, as we're saying, a true cinephile, or someone who wants to have this highly emotional, high-tension experience with no distractions. And Alamo Draft House ultimately declined, and they will not be presenting Roma in their theaters. And I wonder if this is going to be an issue for them, and, you know, more to the point, like, how that affects the bottom mind of the business, as you say. Right.

I do think some of it is that November to December is when all of the, quote, good movies are released, so they were also trying to eat a month of the Draft House's most profitable end. There's a lot of competition. I wonder, in August, if there's a Michael Bay movie, whether the Alamo Draft House is slightly more willing to come to terms. You make a great point.

You know, and I think we'll see, because clearly the Cuaron run is setting a precedent for all the other major directors that Netflix works with. Yes. Let me ask you a question. Would you, you're a Netflix subscriber, would you pay an additional $10 or $15 a month to have some sort of theater experience welded into that membership to say, like, I can also go to the theater.

Let's say these theaters are owned by Netflix. Would you go to those theaters for that additional $10 and see those movies in that experience? Because you love to go to the movies. Yes I do.

Like everything, it depends on the fine print. So maybe I'm overcomplicating this. It depends on how much extra I'm paying. Can I reserve seats?

I'm still pro reserve seating. Please do not at me if you're one of these people who likes to get to the movie theater 30 minutes early. This is a reserve seating podcast. But, you know, I think they probably couldn't figure it out.

And yes, I never joined MoviePass. I thought that that was insane. I thought, like, MoviePass was basically an excuse for people to bitch about MoviePass, as far as I could tell. But I would absolutely consider this, because, number one, it's a service I already have, and it's much easier to expand a service that people are already used to giving money to.

It's that somehow psychologically doesn't feel like such an addition. But I do like winning movies. And this would kind of bring together that Spotify plus the live concert that you're talking about. And maybe that's something Spotify should look into if they're not already.

Right. What else? How else does this affect the bottom line? If Alfonso Cuaron gets a theater release, then Martin Scorsese is on the phones right now demanding a theater release.

And so is Michael Bay. And the question is how large it is and how much Netflix has to pay in order to facilitate that. And if they can't facilitate that, how many directors they lose or how many projects they don't get because directors are still insistent that their movies be in theaters. And especially when you start talking about wide releases and larger chains, it costs a lot to release a movie.

It does. We've seen, you know, some struggles with some companies that have attempted to become not just production companies, but distributors over in recent years. You know, this fall was very complicated. I'm trying to print pictures in part because this is actually very hard to do.

And it's very hard to work in tandem with the MPAA, with the theatrical groups, working with those companies, because Netflix is essentially, you know, assault the long-term business strategy of these companies. And, you know, it's a very uneasy union that they have. And Netflix is going to continue to want to work with high. attention filmmakers at the very least i think because what they get is conversations like this they get a lot of press and attention and analysis and netflix really thrives on that stuff right now because it's a company that sort of operates in debt but also has a high valuation and so there's this complicated sort of financial scheme that is happening where they have to be in the sort of public eye every day they have to be discussed every other content has to be debated every day that's that's different even from something like nbc which even though it's programming 24 hours a day it doesn't have that same that the stakes don't feel that high so it's an interesting thing we'll watch as it develops i'm sure we'll talk about it here um anything else you want to say just about the netflix prestige game i'm really interested to see whether roma can kind of pierce the snotty academy anti-netflix bubble because it does really seem in addition to how looking being not very good or being fine it's like a passing grade right and scrubs being it's not their best minor minor coin brothers it does seem like there is a latent bias against netflix at the oscars you know what's a funny thing that's also happened to there's one more original netflix movie that's coming out this year that's called bird box oh yes which is directed by suzanne beer who was a danish filmmaker and it stars sandra bullock who's of course one of the biggest movie stars on earth and this movie has also been lumped in with a lot of this prestige conversation in part because the filmmaker and the star but also because the platform because now netflix has created this thing where all of a sudden we're like oh a netflix original movie in december maybe it is prestigious my understanding though i have not seen the movie is it actually has more in common with the movie bright which was released by netflix last december maybe not necessarily quality-wise but it is more of a sort of a popcorn movie than it is awards fair we'll see whether that's true or not but it's so funny how quickly the narrative shifts where we go from within the span of 12 months we've gone from bright to quaron and and maybe that's one more reason why they decided to make these choices because then everything seems a little bit better a little bit more high-toned i think so i just am curious whether people go along with that we'll have to wait and find out let's take a quick right here from our sponsor today's episode of the picture is brought to you by cavo cavo control center with universal remote makes everything you have connected to the tv including the remote control easy for the whole family to use cavo control center is the first truly universal tv remote control for your entire home theater you can connect to the four devices like live tv cable dvr game consoles apple tv roku and more plus a sound system once you connect control center you can use the all-in-one voice activated tv remote to control everything that's connected to your tv just ask relax and enjoy the cavo control center lets you conduct true universal search across all your apps and subscriptions and centralizes all your content in one place so it's easy to find what you want to watch simple to set up family friendly and works with google voice and amazon alexa plus shipping is free and comes with a 30-day guarantee i'm sean fantasy this is amanda dobbins we're back on the big picture the oscar show amanda we're gonna do stock of stock down you ready i'm so ready we're talking about the frontrunner the frontrunner is jason rightman's new movie it's his second film this year after tally which is a movie i quite like i interviewed earlier this year i encourage you to check that out on this feed the frontrunner is the story of gary hart prospective presidential candidate in 1987 i believe yes right and his downfall and what his downfall meant and what it actually means you know there's a great story on the ring right now by kate nibs about not just this movie but also sort of what that that story represented about media and politics and the way that things have changed or maybe not changed over the last 30 or so years the frontrunner was released last election day in a sort of stunt and it sort of failed and that's an interesting thing to kind of break down i you know jason rightman i think was very knowing about this and he said that this was in fact a stunt in an effort to kind of gin up some publicity about the movie knowing full well that most people would be spending their day either voting or just watching the polls at the end of the day what did you think about this and also about this movie which i think is an interesting subject yeah also i just want to say that frontrunner is no longer the frontrunner was like right there for you and i admire you not taking it this is this is stock up stock down you know you're right you're right i thought the election day thing was not wise i remember even being a little startled when i saw it i understand it as a peg you know it's a crowded world and you gotta get attention uh unfortunately the election took all of the attention before and after and it just seems like a movie about a political scandal that no one under 30 was even alive for it just didn't have a chance and i do think it's true they will be kind of releasing it wider as the month goes on and you can always get more attention but i really believe like the first shot is the first impression count i don't know that it will get back a ton of attention i think the other thing that's in tandem with this is that this movie is too nuanced to get any attention and i don't think it's it has some pretty clear lessons it's a movie about a great man and his downfall it's you know it's not sensing a theme of this podcast and at the oscars and history um it's fine but i do i wouldn't say that it's the most nuanced movie ever but in the current climate if you will and also especially around the election when everyone was just very much on their side it's hard to imagine anything that's awful getting traction which is a terrible thing to say but no i mean it's sad you know for those who don't know the story of heart you know he was a democratic nominee senator from colorado who was sort of a private person but also there have been rumors for many years of having extramarital affairs i mean my man hung out with which the film kind of uh he lied about yeah um and you know he was an interesting figure he was very charismatic a little bit actually robotic but quite a good speaker and sophisticated and had foresight about some significant issues so democrats really tapped him as the next great president who challenged george h.w bush for the presidency and one of those extramarital affairs he got caught with and you know it's famously uh covered by the mani herald that that's who wrote the story yes the movie goes into great detail about how that happened and what those decisions cost not just heart but also maybe the media dignity in american politics there are a lot of kind of ideas working in place here however and i think one of the reasons i like the movie and responded to this book that matt by wrote about this whole story and its aftermath is that there are some reflections of our modern political moment this is a story about a guy who cheated on his ex-wife and then try to cover it up and that just as you say just feels like weirdly nuanced and modest compared to the noisy aggressive bizarre moment we find ourselves in now so i think it's probably not going to register as resoundingly because of that it's a shame because the movie and also matt by's book position the gary heart scandal is kind of a turning point in american politics in terms of our emphasis on the private lives of public figures and that's really interesting question and it's one i thought found myself as a journalist and as a person who loves celebrity gossip thinking a lot about um and there is no real answer um because it is true that the media got a little aggressive with gary heart it's also true that while campaigning he went to party on a yacht called monkey business so there are it's an ongoing question of what is the responsibility of the media of politicians and certainly applicable to right now i don't know that anyone will go see it and then engage with those questions which is a shame for the movie and it's also a shame for our political system yeah to me it's ultimately a more interesting movie i think about the concepts of privacy and how privacy has eroded not just in politics but kind of in the world at large you know there's just so many outputs for people to share what's happening with themselves and also similarly to kind of capture people doing things that they should or should not be doing and that aspect of it i found really appealing it's too bad too because you know hugh jackman is a very interesting actor who's often doing things where i wish he would just turn down the volume like three degrees and this is a very controlled interesting performance i think his wig is doing a lot of the work in this movie or his hair or whatever it is um but he's also he's quite good in the movie and i think if it had been positioned differently or released at a different time there would be a lot more energy going towards him in this in this race and we talked about this picture last time we were doing this and all of a sudden i'm like well i guess he's not gonna be there yeah i think you're right i really liked the jackman performance there is a scene on the aforementioned monkey business yacht that's just a shot of him that i thought was pretty astonishing i've never seen he jackman like that and his face just kind of changes but i'm not sure i've ever been in the best actor conversation because as soon as you put attention on him then the way these conversations and we're gonna talk a lot about this in the coming months but the way that these oscar races go you're judging the character and the morals as much as you are judging the performance often and it's not a climate for gary hart right now i would say i agree with you let's talk about what we do want in this climate and that's gonna take us for the next segment which is this week's the buzzword the buzzword this week is crowd pleaser amanda you and i both saw the movie green book last week we did green book is an incredibly charming movie that really surprised me it's directed by peter fairly one half of the fairly brothers who people may know from there's something about mary kingpin any number of grossed out brilliant comedies this movie's a little bit different it stars vigo mortensen and mahershal ali academy award winner mahershal ali as two men in i believe is it the early 1960 yes and vigo mortensen is a bouncer at the copacabana and he has been hired by mahershal ali who plays a man named doc shirley who is a sort of a jazz musician pot musician young player and he has essentially been hired to escort him around the american south for an unlikely tour with his music of course there's a lot of complicated things on the surface of this movie which is we've seen movies like this before about a white man and a though people can teach each other about humanity and existence and decency and those these movies are often very treacle but they're also very effective and we've seen examples of it in the past tell me a little bit about your thoughts on green book but also the idea of the crowd pleaser because i think this movie is going to make people really happy it certainly is and it made me very happy which i'm surprised by the trailer features two of our greatest actors in vigo and mahershala and if you have any experience of this you're going to learn that racism is bad and then a lot of people are going to feel very proud of themselves that they watched a movie and they also learned that racism is bad and you know i think we should talk about those elements of the movie and i think there is a discussion to be had the movie is ultimately a bit more than that it's about two men who become friends i have been calling it a rom-com a platonic rom-com between vigo and mahershala and i don't want to spoil the last shot but the last shot is really rom-com magic it is also such a compelling performance from each of those guys and it's so fun to just watch them that at some point you just kind of can't resist so for me i ended up really liking it and i think a lot of people will find something else to like in it which is i think probably the most distinct definition of crowd pleaser is there's something for everybody i tend to think of it i go to the movies with my family a lot over the holidays because what else are you supposed to do and the movie that you can go and grandma and your 11 year old cousin and you can also all sit there together and nothing terrible happens and no one is scarred at the end of the movie that's crowd pleaser i think that's right and i think that there is something in this movie that fits the definition we've seen other movies like this in the past you can as recently as hidden figures this was the classic crowd pleaser you know 10 or 12 years ago we had lona sunshine that was a crowd pleaser you know there have been sort of more unfortunate examples of this movie that haven't aged as well you know driving a daisy famously was a crowd pleaser and operating in a similar role where sort of a black man teaches a white woman about how things work and much happening in a car this way though and you use the word nuance earlier there is a little bit more nuance there's also a lot more charm and it's quite funny it also just rides completely on these two performers and i think if this movie had starred i don't even two great actors like if it had just been let's say tom hanks and denzel that's the highest possible level you could put in this movie right that would have been the 100 million version of this movie i don't even necessarily know that it would have been better which is weird to say but there's something specific about both of the actors that fits in the tone and the meter of this movie there is also a chemistry which is again why i bring up romantic comedies it's that they are really working against and well working with each other and there is that just kind of ineffable magic of oh it's these two people who do really like being together and are discovering that and then you as an audience member want to be along for the literal ride yes i'll be shocked if both of these guys are not nominated i'll be shocked if this is not nominated for best picture i'll be very surprised if it's not a big hit comes out on thanksgiving as you say perfect to go to with your family it's for everyone it's also just for our purposes a very interesting story to tell about somebody like peter fairly who is certainly an interesting filmmaker insofar as he's made a lot of movies people have seen and like and have thought about and memorialized never done anything like this and it's fun to say like oh you can be 60 and shift the direction of your career obviously he's got all the advantages in the world and he's a very you know successful and powerful person but he has managed to evolve his style in a way to make this story work it's also we should say based on a true story and you know it doesn't it doesn't feel kind of ginned up you know a lot of what happens in the movie feels incredible and one of the co-writers of the movie is tony lip who is vigo morson is his son and so you know there's a lot of veracity is probably too strong a word but there's something authentic about it i think so i think there's also a lot of you know despite the trailer and kind of what it looks like on the surface which i think you and i were both surprised by how it was most definitely i'm right the trailer is just not well the trailer is for a different audience the trailer is trying to make it make it a hundred million dollar movie but i will say that despite skepticism for the nature of the film there is a lot of goodwill there's goodwill for vigo as well and who has just been in every type of movie everyone has a vigo performance they just love which you can't say for a lot of people and then a tremendous amount of goodwill for mahershala who we should know will also be starring in season three of true detective starting in january so mahershala season comments it is upon us and it's an interesting thing you know we've seen this before where an actor positions a couple of projects simultaneously i mean i don't think mahershala necessarily scheme to this but it's sort of like watching two corporate entities realize like-minded opportunity and mahershala just being everywhere while nominated for a golden globe and nominated for an oscar and starring in a prestige cable channel's biggest show for that season is good fortune kind of for everyone and i think we'll be seeing a lot of mahershala and you know the thing is is that and we've you know we've seen him at parties in los angeles we've seen him like he's a genuinely charming decent cool guy and so a lot of people just root for him if you come across him or you see him in a show or something you're just like i like that guy yeah and i also think that's true of the green book performance which for me really confirmed you know we knew he was great we knew that he was super charming he looks great on the cover of gq extremely handsome you root for him but he just fills up the screen and it's kind of oh this isn't an accident this is a real real actor this is a real career that we're watching happen in real time and it's exciting to be a part of that to feel like he ran on the ground floor and now this person is probably gonna win has a good chance to win his second oscar in what two years yeah it would be two in three years if he wins here and i think in many ways he is pardon the pun the frontrunner for that that oscar right now from best supporting actor to best supporting actress let's talk about the big race my husbands aren't coming back this is an interesting time on friday the movie widows opens this is stephen queen's fourth film stephen queen of course started filters a slave shame hunger great british filmmaker widows is awesome the best thing we have going for us is being who we are why because no one thinks we have the balls to pull this off i was just gonna say can i just start screaming yeah widows is great it's fun it's funny i mean you and i are oddly agreeing a lot more than i expected thus far on the show um maybe we'll change that if we get to december but i think you know you and i saw widows a couple weeks ago we're talking about best supporting actress because of course viola davis is the star of this movie especially nominated she's already won previously for her work expenses however i think this is a really interesting movie to talk about in the best supporting actress race because there's a few figures you know maybe they'll be nominated maybe they won't but there's kind of a lot to unpack here so the stars of this movie are biola colin farrell brian tyree henry those are the guys i was just gonna say robert duval whom i love wonderful robert duval performance liam neeson obviously yeah that's fine it it's not john bernthal okay it's there a lot of nice men congratulations to them shout out to them yeah here are the people i'm most interested in talking about michelle rodriguez elizabeth tabicki carrie coon and cynthia rievo yes because this movie is about them this is a movie about women that's just an exciting rare thing to say so let's just focus on that and all four of those women are great in this movie they all sort of have their moment for me personally the person who leapt off the screen was elizabeth tabicki who is you know people may know her from the man from uncle or what was that john mccary adaptation the mc had on the night manager um she's been in marvel movies she's an extraordinarily tall woman and she's quite tall very tall she's very graceful quite beautiful and she's a great actress and this is a really cool role for her she basically plays a sort of young woman from chicago who has maybe not been treated by the people in her life very well her mother boyfriends she's kind of cross purposes in her life trying to figure out who she should be and what kind of person she should be she's really good in this she's very good in it and i'm curious to see if the i think what's gonna happen is the reviews are gonna hit this week and people are gonna start to earmark her over all these other people even though there's other actresses we'll talk about quite good in this movie And there's going to be a campaign, a momentum campaign.

I wouldn't be surprised if you're right. She is also kind of an Oscar blogger's favorite, for lack of a better word. The people who see a lot of movies really love Dubicki and have been kind of anticipating this. Like, it's in the same way it's, you know, Claire Foy season or rehearsal season, it's Dubicki season, which is great.

I think Dubicki is a great threat to Claire Foy in this race. That's right. I don't think Claire Foy is going to win this Oscar. You know, I love her.

I wish her the best. We're just happy to be nominated. Okay. But I'm going to put Cynthia Erivo in the mix because she's the one who jumped out to me.

She shows up really halfway through the movie and then it's just, it takes it away. And she also, as you and I have discussed a bit, is nearing EGOT territory. That's true. And people love an EGOT.

They do. For those of you who don't read the internet, God bless you. An EGOT, just really keep making your choices. An EGOT is an award that was made up and then popularized by 30 Rock.

And it's someone who has won an Emmy, an Oscar, a Grammy, and a Tony. And there are not that many EGOTs in history. I think it's like 22. Yeah.

And fewer women EGOTs as well. So this would be a big achievement. And a Revo's three out of four. Yeah.

And so people really do like to read for that. And when you have a little extra narrative built in, you tend to stick around longer in Oscar season. And she's a person, you know, this is only her second or third film role. She's best known as a stage actor.

She's British. She plays an extremely tough woman from Chicago in this movie, incredibly. You know, people may have seen her, though probably not many people, in Bad Times at the El Royale, which was a thriller that came out in October. And in that movie, she plays a kind of Mary Wells, Diana Ross-esque pop Motown singer.

And she sings a lot. And it's a very physical performance. She's very good in that movie, which I think was not very well received. And this also is a very physical kind of performance.

She's really tough and kind of acting with her body and her brain at the same time. And you're right, she does jump off the screen. There's several scenes in which she's just running. Yes.

They're like on the level of the Tom Cruise running kind of scene. And she's really quite powerful. If she's not nominated here, and she may be, I think we're going to see her again pretty soon because she seems like a person who, you know, studios have noticed, the agencies have noticed. It's sort of like Cydia Rebo is now on the radio.

It's happening, yes. And that's an interesting thing that happened. You know, Michelle Rodriguez and Carrie Coon have smaller roles and I think maybe slightly less defined roles in this movie. They're both very good.

I think they have no chance to be nominated. I do wish Michelle Rodriguez would do more movies like this. And I think she has, unfortunately, a quote unquote bad reputation for being difficult on set. And Stephen Queen has talked about this and she was wonderful on set and made it in this movie.

And, you know, she's obviously become very successful for all her work in the Fast and the Furious films. But she got her start in an independent film. You know, she was in Girl Fight, that great Karna Kuzama movie 90 years ago. And I don't know, I just like Michelle Rodriguez.

I do too. I mean, I think the other thing is they don't make that many movies like this. So she made more movies where, you know, I walked out of it and we'll talk more about Widows when people have seen it. But there have been several kind of gender reversal reboots in recent years, which kind of all exhilarating.

And I think if you want to make more heist movies starring women, which also, by the way, are kind of what the Fast and Furious movies are, Michelle Rodriguez should do all of them. If you want to hear more about Widows, please stay tuned to this feed. We'll be covering him with some sincerity. And, you know, I'm reluctant to do this given that you just debunked it as a concept.

But I think that the movie that we're going to talk about in this category is kind of interesting because it's sort of Outlaw King, but with women, which is the favorite. No, take that back. We're not putting the favorite in the same sentence as Outlaw King, okay? Okay, so it's odd to be consecutively hyping a movie as aggressively as we are with Green Book and Widows and a favorite.

But those are three of my favorite movies of the year, candidly. And the favorite is also a contender in Best Supporting Actress. And we'll kind of wrap things up by talking about this because it's an interesting movie that stars primarily three women. I apologize for my appearance.

I hope I might be employed here by you. That's something. A monster for the children to play with, perhaps. Rachel Weisz, Emma Stone, and Olivia Colman.

It was announced about a month ago that Olivia Colman would officially be placed in the Best Actress category by Fox Searchlight, who's releasing the movie, which leaves Rachel Weisz and Emma Stone, both of whom have Oscars, running in Best Supporting Actress. And this is an interesting thing. And I think we might even disagree a little bit on this one. And we're going to talk about category fraud as time goes by on this show.

But I'm not totally sure that they have aligned the correct formulation here and who fits in what category. And I'm curious to see who will suffer for it. Who do you think? Because Olivia Colman is going to be nominated.

And she's steady money to win in Best Actress. And she's very good in the movie. She plays the queen. Emma Stone and Rachel Weisz, I'm not sure both are making it.

And maybe neither makes it. Maybe they cancel each other out. Yeah, do you think either will make it? I mean, the case for them is they're really famous.

And they're really liked by the Academy. And the show definitely wants people like that at the show. But it's challenging because I would say they have about equal screen time. They're obviously pitted against one another in this film, which creates a kind of narrative to this whole thing.

If you had to just put money on it today, who's going to be at the Oscars and not be the best supporting actress, Emma Stone or Rachel Weisz? Probably Emma Stone because she's more famous. And also because, as you pointed out, and I think this is true, even though I remain part of the Rachel Weisz hive, is that Emma Stone has kind of the more interesting arc. She gets to do more weird stuff.

And everyone's doing some pretty weird stuff in the movie. Yeah, this is Yorgos' line most of the movie. The Lobster, The Feeling of a Sacred Deer. This is a very strange movie.

It's beautiful and interesting and funny and incredibly staged. But it's weird. Yorgos' movies are weird. But Emma Stone is playing a bit more against type, which the Oscars likes in general, but especially in the supporting actors category.

And she's more famous. And somehow Rachel Weisz has already won in supporting actors. Yes, for the content garden. Yeah, so I kind of think they'll pivot to Emma Stone in that role for whatever reason.

It's flashier. Flashy wins. It's hard to say because right now, if you look at Goldberg's odds for this category, it's four contenders in films that have not been released. Regina King is 39 to 10, which is an odds formulation I've never seen.

And then lead for If Beale Street to talk Barry Jenkins in this film. Emma Stone is here. Amy Adams is here for Vice. She's playing Liz Cheney.

The perennial Amy Adams. Amy Adams, who I think has nominated five times and has never won. So keep on her. Your beloved Claire Foy, who I sense is sinking.

Rachel Weisz for the favorite. And then there's a few stragglers at the bottom. Obviously, we talked a little bit about Elizabeth Debicki. She's not in the top 10.

I think Marina de Tavira is a very interesting figure, too, from Roma. And when people see the movie, they will start to see... I could see her rising in estimation. And the supporting categories are also often friendlier to foreign language performers than the lead categories.

And then there's a few others. Nicole Kidman is Reagan Boyerace. Michelle Yeoh in Crazy Rich Asians. I think it would be a great thing.

I would love that one. The Crazy Rich Asians campaign has not really started, which I'm a little confused by. If I were Warner Brothers, I would be going out of my way to push the second round of that movie. You know, pushing on VOD, I put billboards up.

Like, it's a real FYC movie where if you remind people how much they liked it, it might do wonders for it. We'll see about Michelle Yeoh, Margot Robbie, and Mary Pino Scott. We haven't seen that film yet. Linda Carlini, who plays Vigo's wife in Green Book.

Debicki, we discussed. It's an interesting category that feels very unsettled. Two months ago, I would have been like, maybe Letitia Wright from Black Panther will be nominated. But now it seems like there's no chance.

That would be great, though. It would be fun. We're going to be back in two weeks. And starting in two weeks, we're going to be with you every single week.

Are you ready for that, man? I'm ready. In the meantime, this is the Oscar show. Thanks very much, man.

Thank you. Thanks so much for listening to this week's episode of The Big Picture, which is brought to you by Cabo. The Cabo Control Center is the first truly universal TV remote control for your entire home theater. Connect up to four devices and centralize all your content in one place, so you can easily find what you want when you want it.

It's simple to set up, and shipping is free. Shop now at Cabo.com and use promo code BIGPICTURE for 20% off. That's C-A-A-V-O.com, promo code BIGPICTURE for 20% off.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of The Big Picture?

This episode is 49 minutes long.

When was this The Big Picture episode published?

This episode was published on November 13, 2018.

Can I download this The Big Picture episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!