Peer Review Week 2026 | Discussing the Themes with the Editor-in-Chiefs of the SLAS Journals episode artwork

EPISODE · Sep 14, 2026 · 19 MIN

Peer Review Week 2026 | Discussing the Themes with the Editor-in-Chiefs of the SLAS Journals

from New Matter: Inside the Minds of SLAS Scientists · host SLAS

In this episode, we celebrate Peer Review Week 2026 with guests SLAS Discovery Editor-in-Chief Bob Campbell, PhD, and SLAS Technology Editor-in-Chief Ed Chow, PhD, to discuss the growing pressures on peer review—rising submission volumes (especially in AI and bioinformatics), fewer available reviewers post-COVID, and the challenge of finding crossover expertise. They advocate for formalized mentorship of early-career researchers, emphasize that good reviews offer constructive paths to publication rather than outright rejection, and encourage reviewers to accept or decline quickly and prioritize revision rounds.Key Learning PointsCapacity is squeezed – Submission volume is up (especially in silico/AI papers), while reviewers are more selective and reviewing less than pre-COVID.Mentorship matters – Pairwise mentor programs (PI + grad student/fellow) formalize peer review training and build the next generation of reviewers.Good reviews improve papers – The best reports give concrete, actionable suggestions and ask whether results justify conclusions—not just reject.Know your expertise – Reviewers should ask editors if unsure about fit; editors can pair a statistician with a biologist, for example.Timeliness is critical – Accept or decline quickly; revision reviews should be fast since they only assess whether authors addressed prior comments.Stay connected with SLAS:www.slas.org | Facebook | X | LinkedIn | Instagram | YouTubeAbout SLASSLAS (Society for Laboratory Automation and Screening) is an international professional society of academic, industry and government life sciences researchers and the developers and providers of laboratory automation technology. The SLAS mission is to bring together researchers in academia, industry and government to advance life sciences discovery and technology via education, knowledge exchange and global community building.Upcoming Events:SLAS Meet-UpsLeiden, Netherlands (10 September 2026)Tübingen, Germany (20 October 2026)SLAS 2026 Sample Management Symposium (October 21-22, 2026 | South San Francisco, California)SLAS2027 International Conference & Exhibition (January 30 - February 3, 2027 | San Diego, California)Thrive in Science: A Women's Leadership Forum 2027 (January 31, 2027 | San Diego, California)View the full events calendar

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Sep 14, 2026

Embed this episode

In this episode, we celebrate Peer Review Week 2026 with guests SLAS Discovery Editor-in-Chief Bob Campbell, PhD, and SLAS Technology Editor-in-Chief Ed Chow, PhD, to discuss the growing pressures on peer review—rising submission volumes (especially in AI and bioinformatics), fewer available reviewers post-COVID, and the challenge of finding crossover expertise. They advocate for formalized mentorship of early-career researchers, emphasize that good reviews offer constructive paths to publica...

Distinct summary based on available episode metadata or transcript content.

Ready to play

Peer Review Week 2026 | Discussing the Themes with the Editor-in-Chiefs of the SLAS Journals

0:00 19:21

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of New Matter: Inside the Minds of SLAS Scientists?

This episode is 19 minutes long.

When was this New Matter: Inside the Minds of SLAS Scientists episode published?

This episode was published on September 14, 2026.

Can I download this New Matter: Inside the Minds of SLAS Scientists episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!