Podcast 182: Dietary fat studies meta-analyzed — trans fat still a bad bet episode artwork

EPISODE · Aug 16, 2015 · 19 MIN

Podcast 182: Dietary fat studies meta-analyzed — trans fat still a bad bet

from Clinical Conversations · host NEJM Group

The BMJ’s meta-analysis of several large cohorts finds no association of saturated fat with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality or total coronary disease. Trans fat, on the other hand, increased risk in all those categories. The first author on the paper, Dr. Russell de Sousza, isn’t ready to give a free pass to saturated fat, though. Listen in as he explains. BMJ meta-analysis (free) Physician’s First Watch coverage (free) [Running time: 19 minutes] The post Podcast 182: Dietary fat studies meta-analyzed — trans fat still a bad bet first appeared on Clinical Conversations.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Aug 16, 2015

Embed this episode

The BMJ’s meta-analysis of several large cohorts finds no association of saturated fat with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality or total coronary disease. Trans fat, on the other hand, increased risk in all those categories. The first author on the paper, Dr. Russell de Sousza, isn’t ready to give a free pass to saturated fat, though. Listen […]

Distinct summary based on available episode metadata or transcript content.

NOW PLAYING

Podcast 182: Dietary fat studies meta-analyzed — trans fat still a bad bet

0:00 19:14

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Clinical Conversations?

This episode is 19 minutes long.

When was this Clinical Conversations episode published?

This episode was published on August 16, 2015.

Can I download this Clinical Conversations episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!