Podcast 188: Should “deintensification” be a quality-of-care measure? episode artwork

EPISODE · Nov 1, 2015 · 13 MIN

Podcast 188: Should “deintensification” be a quality-of-care measure?

from Clinical Conversations · host NEJM Group

The ACCORD trial found dangers in too-strict control of blood pressure and glucose in diabetes. Our guest has just published a study in JAMA Internal Medicine measuring the scope of the problem. Using Veterans Affairs data, his group found that “deintensification” of therapy after targets were met or exceeded was disappointingly rare. JAMA Internal Medicine study (free abstract) Physician’s First Watch summary (free) The post Podcast 188: Should “deintensification” be a quality-of-care measure? first appeared on Clinical Conversations.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Nov 1, 2015

Embed this episode

The ACCORD trial found dangers in too-strict control of blood pressure and glucose in diabetes. Our guest has just published a study in JAMA Internal Medicine measuring the scope of the problem. Using Veterans Affairs data, his group found that “deintensification” of therapy after targets were met or exceeded was disappointingly rare. JAMA Internal Medicine study […]

Distinct summary based on available episode metadata or transcript content.

NOW PLAYING

Podcast 188: Should “deintensification” be a quality-of-care measure?

0:00 13:43

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Clinical Conversations?

This episode is 13 minutes long.

When was this Clinical Conversations episode published?

This episode was published on November 1, 2015.

Can I download this Clinical Conversations episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!