Political Ads of the 2010 Midterms: More Expensive, Negative episode artwork

EPISODE · Oct 6, 2010 · 7 MIN

Political Ads of the 2010 Midterms: More Expensive, Negative

from Elections 2010 (The Takeaway)

Politicians and their advocates will spend upwards of $4 billion on ads in this mid-term election cycle, according to Thom Mazloom, founder of the M Network, a communications and branding company. So is that such a big deal? There will be 20 to 25 percent more in ad spending than in the midterms of 2006. Besides getting big sooner, the ad campaigns have gone negative much faster. John Dennis' "Wizard of Oz" ad targeting Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi Rep. Alan Grayson's "Dan Webster Taliban" ad targeting Daniel Webster  Jack Conway’s "$2000 Deductible" ad targeting Rand Paul  Below, watch Republican candidate for U.S. Senate in Delaware, Christine O'Donnell's first major political ad.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Oct 6, 2010

Embed this episode

Politicians and their advocates will spend upwards of $4 billion on ads in this mid-term election cycle, according to Thom Mazloom, founder of the M Network, a communications and branding company.

Distinct summary based on available episode metadata or transcript content.

NOW PLAYING

Political Ads of the 2010 Midterms: More Expensive, Negative

0:00 7:09

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Elections 2010 (The Takeaway)?

This episode is 7 minutes long.

When was this Elections 2010 (The Takeaway) episode published?

This episode was published on October 6, 2010.

Can I download this Elections 2010 (The Takeaway) episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!