Possibly the WORST King James Onlyism Speech I've Ever Heard

Send us Fan MailIn this episode of Weighed in the Balance, I respond to Mitch Canupp’s speech from the King James Only debate. His argument raises familiar claims about King James I, Westcott and Hort, and textual variants in modern Bible translations—but do those claims actually address the question being debated?We examine key passages such as John 7:8, Matthew 5:22, 1 Timothy 3:16, and the Comma Johanneum (1 John 5:7), and discuss how textual criticism works, what manuscript evidence exists, and why no central doctrine of Christianity depends on a disputed variant.My goal is not to attack individuals, but to evaluate arguments carefully, honestly, and in light of the best available evidence.Support the showDo you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!! Click here to find us everywhere!!