Skip to content
Prediction vs. Bias in Data: A Debate episode artwork

May 29, 2017 13 min

Prediction vs. Bias in Data: A Debate

from Inside Social Innovation Hosted by Featuring Kristian Lum, Candace Thille, Lucy Bernholz, & Andrew Means

This panel from our Do Good Data | Data on Purpose conference features conference co-hosts Lucy Bernholz of Stanford PACS and Andrew Means of Uptake, along with Stanford education professor Candace Thille, and Kristian Lum, lead statistician at the Human Rights Data Analysis Group. The discussion focuses on the advantages and drawbacks of using data to analyze social trends in areas including higher education and criminal justice. View the slides from this presentation here. https://ssir.org/podcasts/entry/prediction_vs._bias_in_data_a_debate

Episode details come from the podcast's RSS feed.

Embed this episode

Ready to play

Prediction vs. Bias in Data: A Debate

0:00 13:07

No transcript yet.

Requests help us decide what to transcribe next.

Frequently asked questions

How long is this episode of Inside Social Innovation?

This episode is 13 minutes long.

When was this Inside Social Innovation episode published?

This episode was published on May 29, 2017.

Can I download this Inside Social Innovation episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.