Professional Responsibility and MPRE: Confidentiality, Attorney-Client Privilege, Work Product, Exceptions, Prospective Clients, Former Clients, and Disclosure Judgment episode artwork

EPISODE · Jul 15, 2026 · 53 MIN

Professional Responsibility and MPRE: Confidentiality, Attorney-Client Privilege, Work Product, Exceptions, Prospective Clients, Former Clients, and Disclosure Judgment

from Law School · host The Law School of America

» 📘VIEW THE COMPANION STUDY GUIDE📘[💡FREE💡] «▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬EPISODE SUMMARYConfidentiality is broader than attorney-client privilege. The professional duty of confidentiality generally prohibits a lawyer from revealing information relating to representation unless the client gives informed consent, disclosure is impliedly authorized, or an exception applies. The duty applies to information from any source and continues after representation ends.Attorney-client privilege is narrower but powerful in litigation. It protects confidential communications between attorney and client made for the purpose of seeking or providing legal advice. It does not protect underlying facts.Work product protects materials prepared in anticipation of litigation by or for a party or representative. Ordinary work product may sometimes be discovered on a showing of substantial need and undue hardship. Opinion work product receives stronger protection.A lawyer may disclose confidential information with informed consent or when impliedly authorized to carry out representation. Several exceptions also permit disclosure, including preventing reasonably certain death or substantial bodily harm, preventing or rectifying certain client crimes or frauds involving use of the lawyer’s services, obtaining ethics advice, defending the lawyer, complying with law or court order, and limited conflict-check disclosures.Many exceptions are permissive. A lawyer should not over-disclose. Even when disclosure is allowed, the lawyer should reveal no more than reasonably necessary.A lawyer may not assist client crime or fraud. The lawyer may explain legal consequences and assist good-faith legal analysis, but may not help the client deceive others or misuse legal services.For organizational clients, the lawyer represents the entity, not automatically its constituents. Serious wrongdoing within the organization may require reporting up, and in limited circumstances reporting out.Prospective clients receive confidentiality protection even if no representation follows. Former-client confidentiality continues indefinitely, subject to limited exceptions and the generally known limitation.The central lesson is disclosure judgment. Protect client information unless a rule permits or requires disclosure, distinguish confidentiality from privilege and work product, and disclose only what is reasonably necessary.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jul 15, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

Professional Responsibility and MPRE: Confidentiality, Attorney-Client Privilege, Work Product, Exceptions, Prospective Clients, Former Clients, and Disclosure Judgment

0:00 53:08

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Law School?

This episode is 53 minutes long.

When was this Law School episode published?

This episode was published on July 15, 2026.

Can I download this Law School episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!