Psychologist Reevaluates Clancy’s Motive | Hattiesburg News

A forensic psychologist testified that Lindsay Clancy didn’t suffer from postpartum psychosis or hear voices — instead, he believes she killed her children to spare them from a future where she intended to die. He called it an act of love amid a suicide attempt, rejecting the “beast” label while acknowledging her bipolar disorder and depression worsened by insomnia and medication. The defense countered with evidence of Clancy’s stable life, strong work ethic, and loving nature, questioning how such a person could commit this. Prosecutors argue she meticulously planned the murders, even manipulating her husband’s departure — a detail Heilbrun supported as proof of decision-making. Closing arguments loom. Listen in comfort:Get a discount on a Soli Pillow: http://solipillow.com/discount/dnn. Advertise on DNN:[email protected] This is an automated, high-level news summary based on public reporting.Report issues to [email protected]. View sources & latest updates:https://sources.thednn.ai/09aff11e316a258f