Publishers Accuse OpenAI of Hiding Evidence | Tech News

Seventeen major publishers, including The New York Times and Ziff Davis, are suing OpenAI for allegedly hiding critical evidence in their copyright lawsuits, claiming the company withheld datasets and logs that prove its AI models were trained on their copyrighted content. As generative AI tools like ChatGPT increasingly mimic and reproduce journalistic work, publishers fear plummeting traffic and revenue—some reporting drops as high as 60%. OpenAI counters that its practices are protected under fair use and even accuses publishers of invading privacy. With lawsuits still active and similar claims emerging against other tech giants, the legal system is being forced to define the boundaries between innovation and intellectual property in the AI era. Listen in comfort:Get a discount on a Soli Pillow: http://solipillow.com/discount/dnn. Advertise on DNN:[email protected] This is an automated, high-level news summary based on public reporting.Report issues to [email protected]. View sources & latest updates:https://sources.thednn.ai/01d01eede625be67