QFR versus FFR in the 2-year follow-up of FAVOR III Europe: Original Research episode artwork

EPISODE · May 6, 2026 · 15 MIN

QFR versus FFR in the 2-year follow-up of FAVOR III Europe: Original Research

from EuroIntervention | Editor's Choice

In this episode of Editor’s Choice, Dr Aaysha Cader speaks with Doctor Birgitte Andersen about the latest findings from the FAVOR III Europe trial, recently published in EuroIntervention.They discuss the 2-year follow-up comparing quantitative flow ratio (QFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR), including the key outcome that QFR did not demonstrate non-inferiority at one year. Dr Andersen explores potential explanations, including concerns around reproducibility and early event rate differences, and highlights the need for further research to identify patient populations best suited for angiography-based physiological assessment. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published May 6, 2026

Embed this episode

Ready to play

QFR versus FFR in the 2-year follow-up of FAVOR III Europe: Original Research

0:00 15:13

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of EuroIntervention | Editor's Choice?

This episode is 15 minutes long.

When was this EuroIntervention | Editor's Choice episode published?

This episode was published on May 6, 2026.

Can I download this EuroIntervention | Editor's Choice episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!