R v Luckhurst [2022] UKSC 23

from UK Law Weekly · host Marcus Cleaver

A financial investment adviser who is due to go on trial for fraud asked the court to adjust a restraint order that froze his assets so that he could pay legal expenses in relation to civil proceedings brought by investors. The question for the Supreme Court was whether the order could be varied or if the civil proceedings related to the offence. https://uklawweekly.substack.com/subscribe Music from bensound.com

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Aug 22, 2022

Embed this episode

Attribution link and audio player

NOW PLAYING

R v Luckhurst [2022] UKSC 23

0:00 6:58

1×

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Share this episode

Similar Episodes

No similar episodes found.

Similar Podcasts

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of UK Law Weekly?

This episode is 6 minutes long.

When was this UK Law Weekly episode published?

This episode was published on August 22, 2022.

Can I download this UK Law Weekly episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.

URL copied to clipboard!