Radar Tomography Shows a Second Sphinx at Giza

A 50-minute video went up on YouTube going after the second Sphinx research, and George Howard sat down at the Cosmic Tusk to respond to it point by point, without yelling, without nicknames, and with the evidence on screen next to the claims. The result is one of the clearest methodological arguments this channel has produced.The response video begins with a single sentence pulled from the critique itself: the scan is obviously picking up on something. George keeps returning to that sentence because it is doing enormous structural work in a video that otherwise positions the research as pseudoscience. By the end of the 50 minutes, the author of the critique has conceded three times on camera that the data is real, the methods are not in doubt, and the anomaly warrants more research. That is the same position as the research team. The critique is built on a premise its author gives up in the middle of it.The methodological objections George walks through one by one are these: the assertion that Filippo Biondi's lack of an archaeology degree disqualifies his findings, met with the observation that the evidence is SAR data and Doppler analysis and there is exactly one profession qualified to process it; the assertion that the research has not been through formal peer review, met with the distinction between this should be in a journal and this is a random guy running his mouth, only one of which the evidence supports; the mound-not-in-1912-photographs argument, met with Biondi's own conference statement that the mound is almost certainly spoil from early 20th century excavations, which both sides agree on and which changes nothing about what the radar sees below the ground plane; and the final third of the critique, which George characterises simply: when you cannot break the geometry because you never looked at it, and you cannot break the tomography because you never watched it, you go after wallets and motives because that content does not have to survive contact with the data.The standing challenge is on the record. George has invited the author of the critique to sit down on the Cosmic Tusk and go through the tomography unedited, end to end, with the hardest questions on the table. The conference is public. The geometry is checkable. The link is in the description. That is the whole difference between engaging evidence and reacting to a tabloid.Subscribe and turn on notifications. And if you want to be in the room where these conversations happen face to face, Cosmic Summit is returning in 2027 once a thousand people raise their hands at CosmicSummit.com.**LINKS**English-dubbed version of the 2026 Bologne Conference with Dr Filippo Biondi: https://youtu.be/rUl0G7N2iGk?si=r8F4S9M_WqDbn3TtMilo Rossi’s opinion on the SAR scans and second sphinx: https://youtu.be/fHxlV1DgpyE?si=0KRCM2wJ2L15s7Af**COSMIC SUMMIT RETURNS**Raise your interest here: https://www.cosmicsummit.com/**ABOUT**TTN News covers the cosmic history that shaped this planet, the deep human past still buried in the ground, and the disclosure story unfolding right now, with primary sources and the people doing the work.**FOLLOW TTN NEWS**[https://www.facebook.com/cosmicsummit] · [https://x.com/Cosmicsummitx] · [https://www.instagram.com/cosmic.summit/] · [https://thetitan.network/]#TTNNews #GeorgeHoward #SecondSphinx #FilippoBiondi #CosmicTusk #Giza #GizaPlateau #SARData #RadarTomography #AncientEgypt #DebunkDebunked