Radical Agreement

from Divided Argument · host Will Baude & Dan Epps

After taking some listener questions, we analyze the lengthy shadow docket opinions in Labrador v. Poe, dealing with universal relief, emergency applications, and more. We then tackle two recent merits opinions: Devillier v. Texas (takings) and Muldrow v. St. Louis (Title VII).

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Apr 26, 2024

Embed this episode

Attribution link and audio player

Ready to play

Radical Agreement

0:00 1:10:28

1×

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Share this episode

Similar Episodes

No similar episodes found.

Similar Podcasts

The Big View Reuters Reuters Breakingviews columnists tap their best contacts to explore the biggest issues driving business and markets today. Every Tuesday, Global Editor Peter Thal Larsen and his team tackle a pressing question with a senior executive, financier, policymaker, or other expert. The Big View helps you understand what is going on, explore all sides of the argument, and think about what happens next. [For previous The Exchange podcast users, we didn't want to leave you hanging so we've decided to repurpose this feed for the launch of The Big View podcast. You can still find the legacy episodes below marked under the old title]

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Divided Argument?

This episode is 1 hour and 10 minutes long.

When was this Divided Argument episode published?

This episode was published on April 26, 2024.

Is there a transcript available for this episode?

Yes, a full transcript is available for this episode. You can read the complete transcript on the episode page.

Can I download this Divided Argument episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.

URL copied to clipboard!