Rana Siu Inboden on China and the International Human Rights Regime episode artwork

EPISODE · Sep 14, 2021 · 49 MIN

Rana Siu Inboden on China and the International Human Rights Regime

from Democracy Paradox · host Justin Kempf

Chinese participation in the human rights regime probably was never really intended to alter human rights so much in China that it would jeopardize the Chinese Communist Party’s hold on power. I think China, even if it may have been open to some areas of human rights, I think that we have to keep in mind that the full implementation of human rights including all of the elements of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights would mean that political competition is allowed. And that's just not something I see the current Chinese regime allowing.Rana Siu InbodenA full transcript is available at www.democracyparadox.com or a brief primer on the human rights regime here.Rana Siu Inboden  is a senior fellow with the Robert Strauss Center for International Security and Law at the University of Texas–Austin. Her new book is China and the International Human Rights Regime: 1982-2017.Key Highlights IncludeWhat is the Human Rights RegimeChina's Participation in the Human Rights RegimeHow Tiananmen Changed China's View on Human RightsWhat is the Like Minded GroupHow China Views Human RightsKey LinksChina and the International Human Rights Regime: 1982-2017 by Rana Siu InbodenChina at the UN: Choking Civil Society by Rana Siu Inboden in Journal of DemocracyUnited Nations Human Rights CouncilRelated ContentMareike Ohlberg on the Global Influence of the Chinese Communist PartyXiaoyu Pu on China's Global IdentitiesMore from the PodcastMore InformationDemocracy GroupApes of the State created all MusicEmail the show at [email protected] on Twitter @DemParadoxFollow on Instagram @democracyparadoxpodcast100 Books on DemocracySupport the show

Chinese participation in the human rights regime probably was never really intended to alter human rights so much in China that it would jeopardize the Chinese Communist Party’s hold on power. I think China, even if it may have been open to some areas of human rights, I think that we have to keep in mind that the full implementation of human rights including all of the elements of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights would mean that political competition is allowed. And that's just not s...

NOW PLAYING

Rana Siu Inboden on China and the International Human Rights Regime

0:00 49:30

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Supreme Court Justices Supme All advertisements are placed at the beginning of each episode, ensuring you experience Supreme Court Justices without interruptions. No mid-episode advertising cuts, no breaks in our judicial coverage. Just press play, and let the Supreme Court analysis unfold uninterrupted.When the gavel strikes and Supreme Court justices take the bench, history unfolds. Supreme Court Justices is where the Supreme Court of America becomes essential conversation, where America Supreme Court decisions shape society, and where every ruling—from latest Supreme Court decisions to historic judgments by first Supreme Court justices—receives the analysis it deserves. This is where Supreme Court of U.S. authority meets constitutional interpretation, where justice on the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court of U.S. tradition converge.We explore everything that makes the Supreme Court vital to democracy. From breaking Supreme Court today judgment coverage to analyzing Supreme Court latest Civic Media Spotlight Civic Media Civic Media is a pro-democracy radio network serving local communities in Wisconsin. Hear a sample of our best programming from the past week from across our statewide network. Listen Live: 4:00 pm - 6:00 pm Saturday Sunday Open to Debate with David Moscrop Canada 2020 Smart, witty, and thoughtful political conversations that break from the limits of the 24-hour news cycle and the 280 character limit. Listeners will come away with a deeper understanding of the history and implications of the issues that shape us and our environment, anchored in discussions about public policy, and supported by research. Open to Debate is a space for agreeable disagreement based on the belief that such exchanges are essential to the health of our democracy. Crowdsourcing Revolution Amanda Rice Democracy is not a spectator sport. None of us is as smart as all of us. Life is what happens while you’re making other plans. This show aims for community beyond the cliches and ubiquitous individualist, capitalist “solutions” Focusing on stories of resistance and actual change, sharing and acting on our ideas about how to build communities we in which we can all thrive.Part of the Coalition of Independent Voters & Independent Candidates (CIVIC productions)Contact us: [email protected]

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Democracy Paradox?

This episode is 49 minutes long.

When was this Democracy Paradox episode published?

This episode was published on September 14, 2021.

What is this episode about?

Chinese participation in the human rights regime probably was never really intended to alter human rights so much in China that it would jeopardize the Chinese Communist Party’s hold on power. I think China, even if it may have been open to some...

Is there a transcript available for this episode?

Yes, a full transcript is available for this episode. You can read the complete transcript on the episode page.

Can I download this Democracy Paradox episode?

Yes, you can download this episode by clicking the download button on the episode player, or subscribe to the podcast in your preferred podcast app for automatic downloads.
URL copied to clipboard!