Rapid Fire Q&A: Off-Season Programming, RPE, and Volume Progression episode artwork

EPISODE · Aug 24, 2026 · 44 MIN

Rapid Fire Q&A: Off-Season Programming, RPE, and Volume Progression

from Between 2 Racks · host KILO Education

Send us Fan MailWhat should change when an athlete’s schedule, training age, or recovery does not fit the model?In this Rapid Fire Q&A, the KILO team works through the programming decisions that appear when textbook structure meets a real athlete or client.The episode opens with off-season planning for hockey: how training age, competition schedule, and the athlete’s biggest weakness should determine whether you extend anatomical adaptation, hypertrophy, maximum strength, or power. From there, the discussion moves into step loading versus constant loading, including why two sessions can carry the same average intensity but produce different exposures, recovery costs, and strength outcomes.The coaches also explain where RPE and reps in reserve fit inside a percentage-based system, why RPE is often unreliable for selecting load, and where it can still help evaluate the overall stress of a session. They then break down when a client may need to move from low to medium volume, why consistent programming makes that decision easier, and how to give general-population clients the feeling of “more work” without compromising the quality of their strength training.The episode closes with two sharp questions: when twice-weekly training is enough, and when expectations need to change, and why the upper body is “smart” while the lower body is “dumb.”Between 2 Racks is produced by KILO, a coach-led education company for personal trainers and strength coaches who want durable principles, not disposable tactics.Better coaching starts with better decisions.0:00 Intro rapid fire Q&A format0:26 Hockey off-season training progression7:53 How training age affects anatomical adaptation length8:24 Training while still playing at night9:38 Step loading vs constant loading11:10 Step load vs constant load volume math breakdown15:17 Using RPE and RIR19:12 Why RPE is inaccurate for load selection23:32 Moving from low to medium or high volume26:51 Managing clients who want more work than they need32:59 Why training twice a week is frustrating37:05 Weekly activity recommendations research38:12 Why upper body training is more complex than lower body44:02 Closing thoughtsStay Connected with KILO: Have a question? ⁠Submit it for a Rapid Fire episode⁠.Learn more at ⁠trainkilo.com⁠Follow KILO on ⁠Instagram⁠ and ⁠YouTube⁠.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Aug 24, 2026

Embed this episode

Send us Fan Mail What should change when an athlete’s schedule, training age, or recovery does not fit the model? In this Rapid Fire Q&A, the KILO team works through the programming decisions that appear when textbook structure meets a real athlete or client. The episode opens with off-season planning for hockey: how training age, competition schedule, and the athlete’s biggest weakness should determine whether you extend anatomical adaptation, hypertrophy, maximum strength, or power. Fro...

Distinct summary based on available episode metadata or transcript content.

NOW PLAYING

Rapid Fire Q&A: Off-Season Programming, RPE, and Volume Progression

0:00 44:20

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Between 2 Racks?

This episode is 44 minutes long.

When was this Between 2 Racks episode published?

This episode was published on August 24, 2026.

Can I download this Between 2 Racks episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!