EPISODE · Aug 24, 2026 · 44 MIN
Rapid Fire Q&A: Off-Season Programming, RPE, and Volume Progression
from Between 2 Racks · host KILO Education
Send us Fan MailWhat should change when an athlete’s schedule, training age, or recovery does not fit the model?In this Rapid Fire Q&A, the KILO team works through the programming decisions that appear when textbook structure meets a real athlete or client.The episode opens with off-season planning for hockey: how training age, competition schedule, and the athlete’s biggest weakness should determine whether you extend anatomical adaptation, hypertrophy, maximum strength, or power. From there, the discussion moves into step loading versus constant loading, including why two sessions can carry the same average intensity but produce different exposures, recovery costs, and strength outcomes.The coaches also explain where RPE and reps in reserve fit inside a percentage-based system, why RPE is often unreliable for selecting load, and where it can still help evaluate the overall stress of a session. They then break down when a client may need to move from low to medium volume, why consistent programming makes that decision easier, and how to give general-population clients the feeling of “more work” without compromising the quality of their strength training.The episode closes with two sharp questions: when twice-weekly training is enough, and when expectations need to change, and why the upper body is “smart” while the lower body is “dumb.”Between 2 Racks is produced by KILO, a coach-led education company for personal trainers and strength coaches who want durable principles, not disposable tactics.Better coaching starts with better decisions.0:00 Intro rapid fire Q&A format0:26 Hockey off-season training progression7:53 How training age affects anatomical adaptation length8:24 Training while still playing at night9:38 Step loading vs constant loading11:10 Step load vs constant load volume math breakdown15:17 Using RPE and RIR19:12 Why RPE is inaccurate for load selection23:32 Moving from low to medium or high volume26:51 Managing clients who want more work than they need32:59 Why training twice a week is frustrating37:05 Weekly activity recommendations research38:12 Why upper body training is more complex than lower body44:02 Closing thoughtsStay Connected with KILO: Have a question? Submit it for a Rapid Fire episode.Learn more at trainkilo.comFollow KILO on Instagram and YouTube.
Embed this episode
What this episode covers
Send us Fan Mail What should change when an athlete’s schedule, training age, or recovery does not fit the model? In this Rapid Fire Q&A, the KILO team works through the programming decisions that appear when textbook structure meets a real athlete or client. The episode opens with off-season planning for hockey: how training age, competition schedule, and the athlete’s biggest weakness should determine whether you extend anatomical adaptation, hypertrophy, maximum strength, or power. Fro...
NOW PLAYING
Rapid Fire Q&A: Off-Season Programming, RPE, and Volume Progression
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.